TY - JOUR
T1 - A method for implementation of nutritional therapy in hospitals
AU - Rasmussen, Henrik Højgaard
AU - Kondrup, Jens
AU - Staun, Michael
AU - Ladefoged, Karin
AU - Lindorff, Karen
AU - Jørgensen, Lillian Mørch
AU - Jakobsen, John
AU - Kristensen, Hanne
AU - Wengler, Anne
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Background & aims: Many barriers make implementation of nutritional therapy difficult in hospitals. In this study we investigated whether, a targeted plan made by the staff in different departments could improve nutritional treatment within selected quality goals based on the ESPEN screening guidelines.
Methods: The project was carried out as a continuous quality improvement project. Four different specialities participated in the study with a nutrition team of both doctors, nurses, and a dietician, and included the following methods: (1) Premeasurement: assessment of quality goals prior to study including the use of screening of nutritional risk (NRS-2002), whether a nutrition plan was made, and monitoring was documented in the records. (2) Intervention: multidisciplinary meeting for the ward staff using a PC-based meeting system for detecting barriers in the department concerning nutrition, elaboration of an action plan and implementation of the plan. (3) Re-measurement: as in (1) based on information from records and patient interviews, and an evaluation based on focus group interview with the staff. Patients who gave informed consent to participate in the study (>14 years) were included consecutively. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis test was used for ordinal data, and Pearson x2 test for nominative data. P values <0.05 were considered significant. The study was performed in accordance with the Research Ethics Committee.
AB - Background & aims: Many barriers make implementation of nutritional therapy difficult in hospitals. In this study we investigated whether, a targeted plan made by the staff in different departments could improve nutritional treatment within selected quality goals based on the ESPEN screening guidelines.
Methods: The project was carried out as a continuous quality improvement project. Four different specialities participated in the study with a nutrition team of both doctors, nurses, and a dietician, and included the following methods: (1) Premeasurement: assessment of quality goals prior to study including the use of screening of nutritional risk (NRS-2002), whether a nutrition plan was made, and monitoring was documented in the records. (2) Intervention: multidisciplinary meeting for the ward staff using a PC-based meeting system for detecting barriers in the department concerning nutrition, elaboration of an action plan and implementation of the plan. (3) Re-measurement: as in (1) based on information from records and patient interviews, and an evaluation based on focus group interview with the staff. Patients who gave informed consent to participate in the study (>14 years) were included consecutively. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis test was used for ordinal data, and Pearson x2 test for nominative data. P values <0.05 were considered significant. The study was performed in accordance with the Research Ethics Committee.
U2 - 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.003
DO - 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.003
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 16698137
SN - 0261-5614
VL - 25
SP - 515
EP - 523
JO - Clinical Nutrition
JF - Clinical Nutrition
IS - 3
ER -