TY - JOUR
T1 - Added diagnostic value of magnetoencephalography (MEG) in patients suspected for epilepsy, where previous, extensive EEG workup was unrevealing
AU - Duez, Lene
AU - Beniczky, Sándor
AU - Tankisi, Hatice
AU - Hansen, Peter Orm
AU - Sidenius, Per Christian
AU - Sabers, Anne
AU - Fuglsang-Frederiksen, Anders
N1 - Copyright © 2016 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/10
Y1 - 2016/10
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the possible additional diagnostic yield of MEG in the workup of patients with suspected epilepsy, where repeated EEGs, including sleep-recordings failed to identify abnormalities.METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of epilepsy and at least three normal EEGs, including sleep-EEG, were prospectively analyzed. The reference standard was inferred from the diagnosis obtained from the medical charts, after at least one-year follow-up. MEG (306-channel, whole-head) and simultaneous EEG (MEG-EEG) was recorded for one hour. The added sensitivity of MEG was calculated from the cases where abnormalities were seen in MEG but not EEG.RESULTS: Twenty-two patients had the diagnosis epilepsy according to the reference standard. MEG-EEG detected abnormalities, and supported the diagnosis in nine of the 22 patients with the diagnosis epilepsy at one-year follow-up. Sensitivity of MEG-EEG was 41%. The added sensitivity of MEG was 18%. MEG-EEG was normal in 28 of the 30 patients categorized as 'not epilepsy' at one year follow-up, yielding a specificity of 93%.CONCLUSIONS: MEG provides additional diagnostic information in patients suspected for epilepsy, where repeated EEG recordings fail to demonstrate abnormality.SIGNIFICANCE: MEG should be included in the diagnostic workup of patients where the conventional, widely available methods are unrevealing.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the possible additional diagnostic yield of MEG in the workup of patients with suspected epilepsy, where repeated EEGs, including sleep-recordings failed to identify abnormalities.METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of epilepsy and at least three normal EEGs, including sleep-EEG, were prospectively analyzed. The reference standard was inferred from the diagnosis obtained from the medical charts, after at least one-year follow-up. MEG (306-channel, whole-head) and simultaneous EEG (MEG-EEG) was recorded for one hour. The added sensitivity of MEG was calculated from the cases where abnormalities were seen in MEG but not EEG.RESULTS: Twenty-two patients had the diagnosis epilepsy according to the reference standard. MEG-EEG detected abnormalities, and supported the diagnosis in nine of the 22 patients with the diagnosis epilepsy at one-year follow-up. Sensitivity of MEG-EEG was 41%. The added sensitivity of MEG was 18%. MEG-EEG was normal in 28 of the 30 patients categorized as 'not epilepsy' at one year follow-up, yielding a specificity of 93%.CONCLUSIONS: MEG provides additional diagnostic information in patients suspected for epilepsy, where repeated EEG recordings fail to demonstrate abnormality.SIGNIFICANCE: MEG should be included in the diagnostic workup of patients where the conventional, widely available methods are unrevealing.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Electroencephalography
KW - Epilepsy
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Magnetoencephalography
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Evaluation Studies
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.08.006
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.08.006
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 27573996
SN - 1388-2457
VL - 127
SP - 3301
EP - 3305
JO - Clinical Neurophysiology
JF - Clinical Neurophysiology
IS - 10
ER -