TY - JOUR
T1 - AI-Guided Delineation of Gross Tumor Volume for Body Tumors
T2 - A Systematic Review
AU - Pehrson, Lea Marie
AU - Petersen, Jens
AU - Panduro, Nathalie Sarup
AU - Lauridsen, Carsten Ammitzbøl
AU - Carlsen, Jonathan Frederik
AU - Darkner, Sune
AU - Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
AU - Ingala, Silvia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Approximately 50% of all oncological patients undergo radiation therapy, where personalized planning of treatment relies on gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation. Manual delineation of GTV is time-consuming, operator-dependent, and prone to variability. An increasing number of studies apply artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to automate such delineation processes. Methods: To perform a systematic review comparing the performance of AI models in tumor delineations within the body (thoracic cavity, esophagus, abdomen, and pelvis, or soft tissue and bone). A retrospective search of five electronic databases was performed between January 2017 and February 2025. Original research studies developing and/or validating algorithms delineating GTV in CT, MRI, and/or PET were included. The Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) and Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis statement and checklist (TRIPOD) were used to assess the risk, bias, and reporting adherence. Results: After screening 2430 articles, 48 were included. The pooled diagnostic performance from the use of AI algorithms across different tumors and topological areas ranged 0.62–0.92 in dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 1.33–47.10 mm in Hausdorff distance (HD). The algorithms with the highest DSC deployed an encoder–decoder architecture. Conclusions: AI algorithms demonstrate a high level of concordance with clinicians in GTV delineation. Translation to clinical settings requires the building of trust, improvement in performance and robustness of results, and testing in prospective studies and randomized controlled trials.
AB - Background: Approximately 50% of all oncological patients undergo radiation therapy, where personalized planning of treatment relies on gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation. Manual delineation of GTV is time-consuming, operator-dependent, and prone to variability. An increasing number of studies apply artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to automate such delineation processes. Methods: To perform a systematic review comparing the performance of AI models in tumor delineations within the body (thoracic cavity, esophagus, abdomen, and pelvis, or soft tissue and bone). A retrospective search of five electronic databases was performed between January 2017 and February 2025. Original research studies developing and/or validating algorithms delineating GTV in CT, MRI, and/or PET were included. The Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) and Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis statement and checklist (TRIPOD) were used to assess the risk, bias, and reporting adherence. Results: After screening 2430 articles, 48 were included. The pooled diagnostic performance from the use of AI algorithms across different tumors and topological areas ranged 0.62–0.92 in dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 1.33–47.10 mm in Hausdorff distance (HD). The algorithms with the highest DSC deployed an encoder–decoder architecture. Conclusions: AI algorithms demonstrate a high level of concordance with clinicians in GTV delineation. Translation to clinical settings requires the building of trust, improvement in performance and robustness of results, and testing in prospective studies and randomized controlled trials.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - gross tumor volume
KW - segmentation
U2 - 10.3390/diagnostics15070846
DO - 10.3390/diagnostics15070846
M3 - Review
C2 - 40218196
AN - SCOPUS:105002351582
SN - 2075-4418
VL - 15
JO - Diagnostics
JF - Diagnostics
IS - 7
M1 - 846
ER -