Abstract
Introduction
Anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR), a novel test of anal sphincter function, was shown to predict a successful trial phase of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for fecal incontinence. This follow-up study aims to explore if AAR can also predict short- and long-term SNM outcomes at less than and more than 5 y, respectively.
Methods
Outcome data were reviewed from a prospectively managed database. Successful treatment was defined as >50% improvement in patient reported fecal incontinence or urgency episodes, or in a symptom severity score.
Results
Twenty-six female patients (median: 53 y [range 31-80]) who received a permanent SNM implant were analyzed. In the short-term, no differences were observed in baseline AAR and symptom severity parameters between patients reporting success or failure. At long-term follow-up (median: 122 mo [113-138]) data was available from 17 (17/26, 65%) patients with 7 (7/17, 41%) reporting continued treatment success. Baseline fecal urgency episodes (P = 0.003), and the AAR parameters of opening elastance (P = 0.043) and squeeze opening elastance (P = 0.025) were significantly different between patients reporting success and those reporting failure. Squeeze opening elastance demonstrated the greatest ability to discriminate between success and failure (area under the curve: 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.60-1.01, P = 0.003)).
Conclusions
AAR may have a role in identifying patients suitable for SNM treatment with clinically relevant metrics associated with successful response to treatment. Future work should explore this further to improve SNM patient selection.
Anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR), a novel test of anal sphincter function, was shown to predict a successful trial phase of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for fecal incontinence. This follow-up study aims to explore if AAR can also predict short- and long-term SNM outcomes at less than and more than 5 y, respectively.
Methods
Outcome data were reviewed from a prospectively managed database. Successful treatment was defined as >50% improvement in patient reported fecal incontinence or urgency episodes, or in a symptom severity score.
Results
Twenty-six female patients (median: 53 y [range 31-80]) who received a permanent SNM implant were analyzed. In the short-term, no differences were observed in baseline AAR and symptom severity parameters between patients reporting success or failure. At long-term follow-up (median: 122 mo [113-138]) data was available from 17 (17/26, 65%) patients with 7 (7/17, 41%) reporting continued treatment success. Baseline fecal urgency episodes (P = 0.003), and the AAR parameters of opening elastance (P = 0.043) and squeeze opening elastance (P = 0.025) were significantly different between patients reporting success and those reporting failure. Squeeze opening elastance demonstrated the greatest ability to discriminate between success and failure (area under the curve: 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.60-1.01, P = 0.003)).
Conclusions
AAR may have a role in identifying patients suitable for SNM treatment with clinically relevant metrics associated with successful response to treatment. Future work should explore this further to improve SNM patient selection.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Journal of Surgical Research |
| Vol/bind | 305 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 183-189 |
| Antal sider | 7 |
| ISSN | 0022-4804 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 2025 |
Bibliografisk note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Author(s)