TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomolecule and Bioentity Interaction Databases in Systems Biology
T2 - A Comprehensive Review
AU - Baltoumas, Fotis A.
AU - Zafeiropoulou, Sofia
AU - Karatzas, Evangelos
AU - Koutrouli, Mikaela
AU - Thanati, Foteini
AU - Voutsadaki, Kleanthi
AU - Gkonta, Maria
AU - Hotova, Joana
AU - Kasionis, Ioannis
AU - Hatzis, Pantelis
AU - Pavlopoulos, Georgios A.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Technological advances in high-throughput techniques have resulted in tremendous growth of complex biological datasets providing evidence regarding various biomolecular interactions. To cope with this data flood, computational approaches, web services, and databases have been implemented to deal with issues such as data integration, visualization, exploration, organization, scalability, and complexity. Nevertheless, as the number of such sets increases, it is becoming more and more difficult for an end user to know what the scope and focus of each repository is and how redundant the information between them is. Several repositories have a more general scope, while others focus on specialized aspects, such as specific organisms or biological systems. Unfortunately, many of these databases are self-contained or poorly documented and maintained. For a clearer view, in this article we provide a comprehensive categorization, comparison and evaluation of such repositories for different bioentity interaction types. We discuss most of the publicly available services based on their content, sources of information, data representation methods, user-friendliness, scope and interconnectivity, and we comment on their strengths and weaknesses. We aim for this review to reach a broad readership varying from biomedical beginners to experts and serve as a reference article in the field of Network Biology.
AB - Technological advances in high-throughput techniques have resulted in tremendous growth of complex biological datasets providing evidence regarding various biomolecular interactions. To cope with this data flood, computational approaches, web services, and databases have been implemented to deal with issues such as data integration, visualization, exploration, organization, scalability, and complexity. Nevertheless, as the number of such sets increases, it is becoming more and more difficult for an end user to know what the scope and focus of each repository is and how redundant the information between them is. Several repositories have a more general scope, while others focus on specialized aspects, such as specific organisms or biological systems. Unfortunately, many of these databases are self-contained or poorly documented and maintained. For a clearer view, in this article we provide a comprehensive categorization, comparison and evaluation of such repositories for different bioentity interaction types. We discuss most of the publicly available services based on their content, sources of information, data representation methods, user-friendliness, scope and interconnectivity, and we comment on their strengths and weaknesses. We aim for this review to reach a broad readership varying from biomedical beginners to experts and serve as a reference article in the field of Network Biology.
KW - biomedical networks
KW - associations
KW - biological interactions
KW - network biology
KW - databases
KW - data integration
KW - MANUALLY CURATED DATABASE
KW - PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS
KW - GENOMICS DATA SETS
KW - ENRICHMENT ANALYSIS
KW - WEB SERVER
KW - NETWORK ANALYSIS
KW - NONCODING RNAS
KW - INTEGRATIVE ANALYSIS
KW - TOPOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
KW - LIGAND INTERACTIONS
U2 - 10.3390/biom11081245
DO - 10.3390/biom11081245
M3 - Review
C2 - 34439912
VL - 11
JO - Biomolecules
JF - Biomolecules
SN - 2218-273X
IS - 8
M1 - 1245
ER -