TY - JOUR
T1 - Combining subjective and objective appraisals of cognitive dysfunction in patients with cancer
T2 - a deeper understanding of meaning and impact on suffering?
AU - Boelsbjerg, Hanne Bess
AU - Kurita, Geana Paula
AU - Sjogren, Per
AU - Hansen, Niels Viggo
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Purpose Patients with advanced cancer often experience cognitive dysfunction, which may influence decision making, self-perception, and existential well-being. However, there is little evidence regarding this issue. This study analysed associations between objective neuropsychological measures and patients' self-report of cognitive dysfunction interfering with everyday life, general well-being, and sense of existential value. Methods A mixed method study assessed 13 adult patients with advanced cancer with validated neuropsychological tests, which assessed sustained attention, psychomotor speed, memory/attention, mental flexibility, and a measure of global cognitive function. These were followed by semi-structured interviews focusing on subjective experiences of cognitive dysfunction. Agreement between subjective and objective measures were analysed by Cohen's Kappa (k). Thematic analysis explored associations with cognitive deficits. Results Poor cognitive performance on the neuropsychological tests was observed regarding sustained attention (n = 8), psychomotor speed (n = 1), memory/attention (n = 2), mental flexibility (n = 9), and global cognitive function (n = 3). Almost all patients (n = 12) had complaints of cognitive dysfunction. However, the agreement between the two assessments was weak (k
AB - Purpose Patients with advanced cancer often experience cognitive dysfunction, which may influence decision making, self-perception, and existential well-being. However, there is little evidence regarding this issue. This study analysed associations between objective neuropsychological measures and patients' self-report of cognitive dysfunction interfering with everyday life, general well-being, and sense of existential value. Methods A mixed method study assessed 13 adult patients with advanced cancer with validated neuropsychological tests, which assessed sustained attention, psychomotor speed, memory/attention, mental flexibility, and a measure of global cognitive function. These were followed by semi-structured interviews focusing on subjective experiences of cognitive dysfunction. Agreement between subjective and objective measures were analysed by Cohen's Kappa (k). Thematic analysis explored associations with cognitive deficits. Results Poor cognitive performance on the neuropsychological tests was observed regarding sustained attention (n = 8), psychomotor speed (n = 1), memory/attention (n = 2), mental flexibility (n = 9), and global cognitive function (n = 3). Almost all patients (n = 12) had complaints of cognitive dysfunction. However, the agreement between the two assessments was weak (k
KW - Cognitive dysfunction
KW - Neuropsychological tests
KW - Patient-reported outcome measures
KW - Neoplasms
KW - Existential well-being
KW - Qualitative research
KW - CONTINUOUS REACTION-TIMES
KW - PALLIATIVE CARE
KW - IMPAIRMENT
KW - CHEMOTHERAPY
KW - ABILITY
KW - HELP
U2 - 10.1007/s00520-021-06777-7
DO - 10.1007/s00520-021-06777-7
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35029771
VL - 30
SP - 3603
EP - 3612
JO - Supportive Care in Cancer
JF - Supportive Care in Cancer
SN - 0941-4355
ER -