Comparison of Early Intervention Services vs Treatment as Usual for Early-Phase Psychosis: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression

Christoph U Correll, Britta Galling, Aditya Pawar, Anastasia Krivko, Chiara Bonetto, Mirella Ruggeri, Thomas J Craig, Merete Nordentoft, Vinod H Srihari, Sinan Guloksuz, Christy L M Hui, Eric Y H Chen, Marcelo Valencia, Francisco Juarez, Delbert G Robinson, Nina R Schooler, Mary F Brunette, Kim T Mueser, Robert A Rosenheck, Patricia MarcyJean Addington, Sue E Estroff, James Robinson, David Penn, Joanne B Severe, John M Kane

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

521 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Importance: The value of early intervention in psychosis and allocation of public resources has long been debated because outcomes in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders have remained suboptimal.

Objective: To compare early intervention services (EIS) with treatment as usual (TAU) for early-phase psychosis.

Data Sources: Systematic literature search of PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov without language restrictions through June 6, 2017.

Study Selection: Randomized trials comparing EIS vs TAU in first-episode psychosis or early-phase schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Data Extraction and Synthesis: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Three independent investigators extracted data for a random-effects meta-analysis and prespecified subgroup and meta-regression analyses.

Main Outcomes and Measures: The coprimary outcomes were all-cause treatment discontinuation and at least 1 psychiatric hospitalization during the treatment period.

Results: Across 10 randomized clinical trials (mean [SD] trial duration, 16.2 [7.4] months; range, 9-24 months) among 2176 patients (mean [SD] age, 27.5 [4.6] years; 1355 [62.3%] male), EIS was associated with better outcomes than TAU at the end of treatment for all 13 meta-analyzable outcomes. These outcomes included the following: all-cause treatment discontinuation (risk ratio [RR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.80; P < .001), at least 1 psychiatric hospitalization (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61-0.90; P = .003), involvement in school or work (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.24; P = .01), total symptom severity (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.32; 95% CI, -0.47 to -0.17; P < .001), positive symptom severity (SMD, -0.22; 95% CI, -0.32 to -0.11; P < .001), and negative symptom severity (SMD, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.42 to -0.14; P < .001). Superiority of EIS regarding all outcomes was evident at 6, 9 to 12, and 18 to 24 months of treatment (except for general symptom severity and depressive symptom severity at 18-24 months).

Conclusions and Relevance: In early-phase psychosis, EIS are superior to TAU across all meta-analyzable outcomes. These results support the need for funding and use of EIS in patients with early-phase psychosis.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJAMA Psychiatry
Vol/bind75
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)555-565
Antal sider11
ISSN2168-622X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

Citationsformater