TY - JOUR
T1 - Culturing stool specimens has no added value in diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis
AU - Bek Folkvardsen, Dorte
AU - Naestholt Dahl, Victor
AU - Wejse, Christian
AU - Svensson, Erik
AU - Lillebaek, Troels
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) may face challenges in providing sputum specimens for diagnosis. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is potentially present in the stool due to swallowed sputum. Therefore easy-to-obtain stool could be used as an alternative to sputum sampling. However, the evidence for using stool specimens for PTB diagnosis is sparse, especially in resource-rich settings. In this study, spanning two years, the results of 562 stool specimens were evaluated alongside those of respiratory specimens sent to the International Reference Laboratory of Mycobacteriology in Denmark. Despite the potential advantages of stool culture, only five out of 19 patients with PTB had Mtb culture-positive stool, all of whom also had positive respiratory specimens. Conversely, relying solely on stool specimens could lead to missed diagnoses of PTB. While stool analysis may offer additional value in specific settings or populations, such as those unable to produce sputum, this study discourages its general use for PTB testing in resource-rich, TB low-incidence settings like Denmark. Instead, we advocate for prospective trials in specific subpopulations to elucidate the role of stool as a complementary diagnostic tool for PTB. The study underscores the importance of tailoring diagnostic approaches based on the setting and patient characteristics.
AB - Patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) may face challenges in providing sputum specimens for diagnosis. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is potentially present in the stool due to swallowed sputum. Therefore easy-to-obtain stool could be used as an alternative to sputum sampling. However, the evidence for using stool specimens for PTB diagnosis is sparse, especially in resource-rich settings. In this study, spanning two years, the results of 562 stool specimens were evaluated alongside those of respiratory specimens sent to the International Reference Laboratory of Mycobacteriology in Denmark. Despite the potential advantages of stool culture, only five out of 19 patients with PTB had Mtb culture-positive stool, all of whom also had positive respiratory specimens. Conversely, relying solely on stool specimens could lead to missed diagnoses of PTB. While stool analysis may offer additional value in specific settings or populations, such as those unable to produce sputum, this study discourages its general use for PTB testing in resource-rich, TB low-incidence settings like Denmark. Instead, we advocate for prospective trials in specific subpopulations to elucidate the role of stool as a complementary diagnostic tool for PTB. The study underscores the importance of tailoring diagnostic approaches based on the setting and patient characteristics.
KW - Culture
KW - Diagnostics
KW - Stool
KW - TB low-burden
KW - Tuberculosis
U2 - 10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100498
DO - 10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100498
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85210139136
VL - 37
JO - Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases
JF - Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases
SN - 2405-5794
M1 - 100498
ER -