Debriefing Methods for Simulation in Healthcare: A Systematic Review

Jonathan P. Duff*, Kate J. Morse, Julia Seelandt, Isabel T. Gross, Melis Lydston, Joan Sargeant, Peter Dieckmann, Joseph A. Allen, Jenny W. Rudolph, Michaela Kolbe

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

7 Citationer (Scopus)
16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Debriefing is a critical component in most simulation experiences. With the growing number of debriefing concepts, approaches, and tools, we need to understand how to debrief most effectively because there is little empiric evidence to guide us in their use. This systematic review explores the current literature on debriefing in healthcare simulation education to understand the evidence behind practice and clarify gaps in the literature. The PICO question for this review was defined as “In healthcare providers [P], does the use of one debriefing or feedback intervention [I], compared to a different debriefing or feedback intervention [C], improve educational and clinical outcomes [O] in simulation-based education?” We included 70 studies in our final review and found that our current debriefing strategies, frameworks, and techniques are not based on robust empirical evidence. Based on this, we highlight future research needs.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftSimulation in Healthcare
Vol/bind19
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)S112-S121
Antal sider8
ISSN1559-2332
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2024

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
P.D. holds a professorship with the University of Stavanger, Norway, that was supported by the Laerdal Foundation but is now financed by the University. P.D. is in the leadership of the EuSim group. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher Copyright:
© Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Citationsformater