Abstract
In Denmark political commentary is still a relatively new phenomenon. This paper analyzes the metadiscourse in relation to political commentary to identify the different understandings that have coalesced around political commentary as a genre. I argue that people in different positions (e.g. citizens, politicians, journalists, political editors, chief editors and political commentators themselves) emphasize different explanations for the rise of the genre and thereby functions of political commentary as part of an argumentative strategy favouring their own interests
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Titel | Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of OSSA, May 18-21, 2011. Windsor, ON (CD ROM) |
| Antal sider | 8 |
| Forlag | Bepress |
| Publikationsdato | 2011 |
| Sider | 1-8 |
| Status | Udgivet - 2011 |
| Udgivet eksternt | Ja |
| Begivenhed | Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference: Argumentation: Cognition & Community - University of Windsor, Windsor, Storbritannien Varighed: 8 maj 2011 → 21 maj 2011 https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA9/ |
Konference
| Konference | Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference |
|---|---|
| Lokation | University of Windsor |
| Land/Område | Storbritannien |
| By | Windsor |
| Periode | 08/05/2011 → 21/05/2011 |
| Internetadresse |
Emneord
- Det Humanistiske Fakultet
- political commentator
- function
- genre
- rhetoric
- persuasion
- democracy
- public debate
- pundit