Abstract
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | International Journal of Obesity |
Vol/bind | 33 |
Udgave nummer | 11 |
Sider (fra-til) | 1280-8 |
Antal sider | 8 |
ISSN | 0307-0565 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 2009 |
Adgang til dokumentet
Citationsformater
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and subsequent changes of weight and waist circumference in European men and women. / Du, H; van der A, D L; van Bakel, M M E; Slimani, N; Forouhi, N G; Wareham, N J; Halkjaer, J; Tjønneland, A; Jakobsen, M U; Overvad, K; Schulze, M B; Buijsse, B; Boeing, H; Palli, D; Masala, G; Sørensen, Thorkild I.A.; Saris, W H M; Feskens, E J M.
I: International Journal of Obesity, Bind 33, Nr. 11, 2009, s. 1280-8.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and subsequent changes of weight and waist circumference in European men and women
AU - Du, H
AU - van der A, D L
AU - van Bakel, M M E
AU - Slimani, N
AU - Forouhi, N G
AU - Wareham, N J
AU - Halkjaer, J
AU - Tjønneland, A
AU - Jakobsen, M U
AU - Overvad, K
AU - Schulze, M B
AU - Buijsse, B
AU - Boeing, H
AU - Palli, D
AU - Masala, G
AU - Sørensen, Thorkild I.A.
AU - Saris, W H M
AU - Feskens, E J M
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether dietary glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) were associated with subsequent weight and waist circumference change. DESIGN: Population-based prospective cohort study. SETTING: Five European countries, which are Denmark, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 89,432 participants, aged 20-78 years (mean =53 years) at baseline and followed for 1.9-12.5 years (mean=6.5 years). All participants were free of self-reported cancer, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes at baseline. METHODS: Glycaemic index and GL were calculated on the basis of dietary intake assessed by food frequency questionnaires and by using a GI table developed for this study with published GI values as the main sources. Anthropometric data were collected both at baseline and at the end of follow-up. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted in each centre and random-effect meta-analyses were used to combine the effects. Adjustment was made for baseline anthropometrics, demographic and lifestyle factors, follow-up duration and other dietary factors. RESULTS: Mean GI and GL were 57 and 134, respectively. Associations of GI and GL with subsequent changes of weight and waist circumference were heterogeneous across centres. Overall, with every 10-unit higher in GI, weight increased by 34 g per year (95% confidence interval (CI): -47, 115) and waist circumference increased by 0.19 cm per year (95% CI: 0.11, 0.27). With every 50-unit higher in GL, weight increased by 10 g per year (95% CI: -65, 85) and waist circumference increased by 0.06 cm per year (95% CI: -0.01, 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support an effect of GI or GL on weight change. The positively significant association between GI, not GL, and subsequent gain in waist circumference may imply a beneficial role of lower GI diets in the prevention of abdominal obesity. However, further studies are needed to confirm this finding given the small effect observed in this study.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether dietary glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) were associated with subsequent weight and waist circumference change. DESIGN: Population-based prospective cohort study. SETTING: Five European countries, which are Denmark, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 89,432 participants, aged 20-78 years (mean =53 years) at baseline and followed for 1.9-12.5 years (mean=6.5 years). All participants were free of self-reported cancer, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes at baseline. METHODS: Glycaemic index and GL were calculated on the basis of dietary intake assessed by food frequency questionnaires and by using a GI table developed for this study with published GI values as the main sources. Anthropometric data were collected both at baseline and at the end of follow-up. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted in each centre and random-effect meta-analyses were used to combine the effects. Adjustment was made for baseline anthropometrics, demographic and lifestyle factors, follow-up duration and other dietary factors. RESULTS: Mean GI and GL were 57 and 134, respectively. Associations of GI and GL with subsequent changes of weight and waist circumference were heterogeneous across centres. Overall, with every 10-unit higher in GI, weight increased by 34 g per year (95% confidence interval (CI): -47, 115) and waist circumference increased by 0.19 cm per year (95% CI: 0.11, 0.27). With every 50-unit higher in GL, weight increased by 10 g per year (95% CI: -65, 85) and waist circumference increased by 0.06 cm per year (95% CI: -0.01, 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support an effect of GI or GL on weight change. The positively significant association between GI, not GL, and subsequent gain in waist circumference may imply a beneficial role of lower GI diets in the prevention of abdominal obesity. However, further studies are needed to confirm this finding given the small effect observed in this study.
U2 - 10.1038/ijo.2009.163
DO - 10.1038/ijo.2009.163
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 19704411
VL - 33
SP - 1280
EP - 1288
JO - International Journal of Obesity
JF - International Journal of Obesity
SN - 0307-0565
IS - 11
ER -