Economic evaluation of a complex intervention to improve the mental health of maltreated children in foster care (BeST? services trial)

Manuela Deidda, Helen Minnis, Karen Crawford, Robin Young, Gary Kainth, Julia Donaldson, Matt Forde, Alex McConnachie, Christopher Gillberg, Marion Henderson, Philip Michael John Wilson, Kathleen Boyd, Emma McIntosh

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Children in foster care who had experienced abuse and neglect are at risk of poor long-term health and societal outcomes. Evidence on the costs, benefits and cost-effectiveness of early interventions aimed at improving the mental health of abused and neglected children, is limited.Methods This study reports the within-trial economic evaluation alongside BEST? , a randomised controlled trial comparing the New Orleans Intervention Model (NIM) with services as usual (SAU), targeting children aged 0-60 months entering UK foster care.
In line with guidance for conducting economic evaluations of complex and social care interventions, a cost-utility analysis (CUA) estimated incremental cost of NIM per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) estimated incremental cost per unit improvement in child mental health and a cost-consequence analysis (CCA) combined costs with broad ranging outcomes.
Results
NIM is significantly more costly than SAU (NIM: £10,002; SAU: £4,336), with wide cost variations according to context. There are no significant differences between NIM and SAU in QALYs or child mental health.
Conclusions
Within the current UK care systems, NIM is not a cost-effective alternative to SAU. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution and within the prevailing service provision context.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Public Health
ISSN1741-3842
StatusAccepteret/In press - 2025

Citationsformater