TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of algorithm development approaches
T2 - Development of biomarker panels for early detection of colorectal lesions
AU - Gawel, Susan H
AU - Lucht, Michael
AU - Gomer, Heather
AU - Treado, Patrick
AU - Christensen, Ib J
AU - Nielsen, Hans J
AU - Davis, Gerard J
AU - Danish Research Group on Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer
N1 - Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the U.S. Early detection of CRC can substantially increase survival rates. Test compliance may be improved by offering a blood-based test option.METHODS: Endoscopy II trial specimens were tested for AFP, CA19-9, CEA, hs-CRP, CyFra 21-1, Ferritin, Galectin-3, and TIMP-1 levels. These biomarkers, as well as patient demographic information (e.g., age, gender), were included in algorithm development. Six statistical methods were utilized to develop algorithms that would discriminate cancer vs. noncancers. Statistical methods included logistic regression, adaptive index modeling, partial least-squares discriminant analysis, feature vector (weighted and unweighted), and random forest. The performance of these algorithms was compared against benchmark criteria established for stool-based tests.RESULTS: Using several statistical methods, the presence of CRC and high-risk adenomas was detected with an AUCs of at least 0.65-0.76, with a few of models approaching the stool-based tests benchmark performance. Further, common markers were utilized across the different statistical techniques, with model complexities ranging from 3 to 9 markers.CONCLUSIONS: Predictive models identified subjects with CRC and high-risk adenomas with the similar levels of statistical accuracy. Clinical performance differences were minimal across the statistical techniques, although the intuitive interpretations, model complexity, clinical adoption and implementation varied.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the U.S. Early detection of CRC can substantially increase survival rates. Test compliance may be improved by offering a blood-based test option.METHODS: Endoscopy II trial specimens were tested for AFP, CA19-9, CEA, hs-CRP, CyFra 21-1, Ferritin, Galectin-3, and TIMP-1 levels. These biomarkers, as well as patient demographic information (e.g., age, gender), were included in algorithm development. Six statistical methods were utilized to develop algorithms that would discriminate cancer vs. noncancers. Statistical methods included logistic regression, adaptive index modeling, partial least-squares discriminant analysis, feature vector (weighted and unweighted), and random forest. The performance of these algorithms was compared against benchmark criteria established for stool-based tests.RESULTS: Using several statistical methods, the presence of CRC and high-risk adenomas was detected with an AUCs of at least 0.65-0.76, with a few of models approaching the stool-based tests benchmark performance. Further, common markers were utilized across the different statistical techniques, with model complexities ranging from 3 to 9 markers.CONCLUSIONS: Predictive models identified subjects with CRC and high-risk adenomas with the similar levels of statistical accuracy. Clinical performance differences were minimal across the statistical techniques, although the intuitive interpretations, model complexity, clinical adoption and implementation varied.
KW - Adenoma/diagnosis
KW - Aged
KW - Algorithms
KW - Area Under Curve
KW - Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis
KW - Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis
KW - Data Interpretation, Statistical
KW - Early Detection of Cancer/methods
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
U2 - 10.1016/j.cca.2019.08.007
DO - 10.1016/j.cca.2019.08.007
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31419412
VL - 498
SP - 108
EP - 115
JO - Clinica Chimica Acta
JF - Clinica Chimica Acta
SN - 0009-8981
ER -