Evaluation of the Feasibility and Efficacy of Point-of-Care Antibody Tests for Biomarker-Guided Management of Coronavirus Disease 2019

Cavan Reilly*, Eleftherios Mylonakis, Robin Dewar, Barnaby Young, Jacqueline Nordwall, Sanjay Bhagani, Po-ying Chia, Ruby Davis, Clark Files, Adit A. Ginde, Timothy Hatlen, Marie Helleberg, Awori Hayanga, Tomas O. Jensen, Mamta K. Jain, Ioannis Kalomenidis, Kami Kim, Perrine Lallemand, Birgitte Lindegaard, Anupama MenonKatherine Ognenovska, Garyfallia Poulakou, Birgit Thorup Røge, Angela J. Rogers, Katy Shaw-Saliba, Uriel Sandkovsky, Barbara W. Trautner, Shikha S. Vasudeva, Andrew Vekstein, Kimberley Viens, James Wyncoll, Brian DuChateau, Zhenxing Zhang, Shujiang Wu, Abdel G. Babiker, Victoria Davey, Annetine Gelijns, Elizabeth Higgs, Virginia Kan, Jens Lundgren, Gail V. Matthews, H. Cliff Lane

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biomarker guided therapy could improve management of COVID-19 inpatients. Although some results indicate that antibody tests are prognostic, little is known about patient management using point-of-care (POC) antibody tests.

METHODS: COVID-19 inpatients were recruited to evaluate 2 POC tests: LumiraDX and RightSign. Ease of use data was collected. Blood was also collected for centralized testing using established antibody assays (GenScript cPass). A nested case-control study assessed if POC tests conducted on stored specimens were predictive of time to sustained recovery, mortality, and a composite safety outcome.

RESULTS: While both POC tests exhibited moderate agreement with the GenScript assay (both agreeing with 89% of antibody determinations), they were significantly different from the GenScript assay. Treating the GenScript assay as the gold standard, the LumiraDX assay had 99.5% sensitivity and 58.1% specificity while the RightSign assay had 89.5% sensitivity and 84.0% specificity. The LumiraDX assay frequently gave indeterminant results. Both tests were significantly associated with clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS: Although both POC tests deviated moderately from the GenScript assay, they predicted outcomes of interest. The RightSign test was easier to use and was more likely to detect those lacking antibody compared to the LumiraDX test treating GenScript as the gold standard.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThe Journal of Infectious Diseases
Antal sider7
ISSN0022-1899
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 12 sep. 2024

Bibliografisk note

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].

Citationsformater