Abstract
Background: The clinical impact of prolonged steep Trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum during robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RC) on intraoperative conditions and immediate postoperative recovery remains to be assessed. The current study investigates intraoperative and immediate postoperative outcomes for open RC (ORC) versus robot-assisted RC with intracorporal urinary diversion (iRARC) in a blinded randomised trial. We hypothesised that ORC would result in a faster haemodynamic and respiratory post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery compared to iRARC. Methods: This study is a predefined sub-analysis of a single-centre, double-blinded, randomised feasibility study. Fifty bladder cancer patients were randomly assigned to ORC (n = 25) or iRARC (n = 25). Patients, PACU staff, and ward personnel were blinded to the surgical technique. Both randomisation arms followed the same anaesthesiologic procedure, fluid treatment plan, and PACU care. The primary outcome was immediate postoperative recovery using a standardised PACU Discharge Criteria (PACU-DC) score. Secondary outcomes included respiration- and arterial O2 saturation scores as well as perioperative interventions and recordings. Results: All patients underwent the allocated treatment. The total PACU-DC score was highest 6 h postoperatively with no difference in the total score between randomisation arms (p = 0.80). Both the ORC and iRARC groups maintained a mean respiration- and arterial O2 saturation score below 1 (out of 3) throughout PACU stay. The iRARC patients had significantly, but clinically acceptable, higher maximum airway pressure and arterial blood pressure, as well as lower minimum pH levels. The ORC group received significantly more opioids after extubation but marginally less analgesics in the PACU, compared to the iRARC group. Conclusions: A prolonged Trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum was well-tolerated during iRARC, and immediate postoperative recovery was similar for ORC and iRARC patients.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica |
Vol/bind | 67 |
Udgave nummer | 3 |
Sider (fra-til) | 293–301 |
Antal sider | 9 |
ISSN | 0001-5172 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 2023 |
Bibliografisk note
Funding Information:This work was supported by the Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet and The Research Fund of Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital. The Research Fund of Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital did not have any role in the design and the conduct of the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.