Spring til hovednavigation Spring til søgning Spring til hovedindhold

Handgrip strength associates with effort-dependent lung function measures among adolescents with and without asthma

Laura Marie Hesselberg, Julie Nyholm Kyvsgaard, Jakob Stokholm, Hans Bisgaard, Klaus Bønnelykke, Bo Chawes*

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

6 Citationer (Scopus)
51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Studies have shown association between handgrip strength (HGS) and FEV1, but the importance of this in relation to asthma pathophysiology and diagnostics remains unclear. We investigated the relationship between HGS and lung function metrics and its role in diagnosing asthma. We included 330 participants (mean age: 17.7 years, males: 48.7%) from the COPSAC2000 cohort and analyzed associations between HGS, asthma status, spirometry measures (FEV1, FVC, MMEF, FEV1/FVC), airway resistance (sRaw), methacholine reactivity (PD20) and airway inflammation (FeNO). Finally, we investigated whether HGS improved FEV1 prediction and classification of asthma status. HGS was only associated with forced flows, i.e., positive association with FEV1 and FVC for both sexes in models adjusted for age, height, and weight (P < 0.023). HGS improved adjusted R2-values for FEV1 prediction models by 2–5% (P < 0.009) but did not improve classification of asthma status (P > 0.703). In conclusion, HGS was associated with the effort-dependent measures FEV1 and FVC, but not with airway resistance, reactivity, inflammation or asthma status in our cohort of particularly healthy adolescents, which suggests that the observed associations are not asthma specific. However, HGS improved the accuracy of FEV1 estimation, which warrants further investigation to reveal the potential of HGS in asthma diagnostics.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer13044
TidsskriftScientific Reports
Vol/bind13
Antal sider9
ISSN2045-2322
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
COPSAC is funded by private and public research funds all listed on www.copsac.com . The Lundbeck Foundation (R16-A1694); The Danish Ministry of Health (903516); Danish Council for Strategic Research (0603-00280B); The Danish Council for Independent Research and The Capital Region Research Foundation have provided core support for COPSAC. No pharmaceutical company was involved in the study. The funding agencies did not have any role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Springer Nature Limited.

Citationsformater