Health-related Quality of Life Assessment in Renal Cell Cancer: A Scoping Review

Franziska Gross, Ida Marie Lind Rasmussen, Elisabeth Grov Beisland, Gøril Tvedten Jorem, Christian Beisland, Helle Pappot, Juan Ignacio Arraras, Madeline Pe, Bernhard Holzner, Lisa M. Wintner, EORTC Quality of Life Group

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewpeer review

3 Citationer (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and objective
In oncology, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) capturing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) play an increasing role in clinical trials, drug approval, and policy making. This scoping review aimed to identify and elaborate on HRQOL-focussed PROMs used in renal cell cancer (RCC) clinical trials.
Methods
MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsychINFO, Academic Search Elite, CINAHL, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically for original peer-reviewed articles on clinical trials including RCC patients and using PROMs, published between 1950 and 2023. Prespecified trial characteristics and information on the PROMs used were extracted. Frequencies and proportions of categorical data, and ranges and medians of continuous variables were calculated.
Key findings and limitations
Of the 48 unique studies included, the majority followed a randomised controlled design (34, 71%) and evaluated systemic treatments (38, 79%). The trials used 27 different PROMs (max = 6, median = 2), of which only 4 (15%) were developed specifically for kidney cancer patients. Of the trials, 46% did not use any RCC-specific PROM. European Quality of Life—5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) —15/19-item version, FKSI—Disease Related Symptoms, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—General (FACT-G) were the most frequently used questionnaires, with pain, ability to work, fatigue, worry, and sleep quality being the most commonly assessed issues.
Conclusions and clinical implications
A variety of PROMs are used in RCC patients, hindering interpretability across trials. The PROMs used differ in terms of both the domains assessed and how the issues are translated into questionnaire items. Though RCC-specific PROMs exist, these have flaws in terms of relevance to patients. To answer predefined relevant HRQOL research questions, revised RCC-specific PROMs and standardisation of their integration into clinical trials are warranted.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean urology oncology
Vol/bind8
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)201-212
Antal sider12
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2025

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Citationsformater