How to produce a rapid systematic review - a review article

Jacob Rosenberg; Siv Fonnes; Stina Öberg; Kristoffer Andresen

How to produce a rapid systematic review - a review article

Jacob Rosenberg, Siv Fonnes, Stina Öberg, Kristoffer Andresen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › peer review

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A rapid review is a synthesis of available evidence in which some components of the review process are modified slightly to shorten the process. This will require tight control as well as day-to-day scientific mentoring. The typical rapid review has a focused research question covering a narrow and well-defined clinical problem. With a continuous focus on some elements in the planning and production phases, it is realistic to produce a rapid scoping or systematic review with or without meta-analysis within three months without compromising on scientific quality.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Artikelnummer	A06220369
Tidsskrift	Danish Medical Journal
Vol/bind	69
Udgave nummer	12
ISSN	2245-1919
Status	Udgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Adgang til dokumentet

FulltextForlagets udgivne version, 532 KBLicens: CC BY-NC-ND

https://content.ugeskriftet.dk/sites/default/files/scientific_article_files/2022-11/a06220369_web-1_0.pdfLicens: CC BY-NC-ND

Citationsformater

@article{66cc3e0198704299a3ecfcdaa9b2fd4d,

title = "How to produce a rapid systematic review - a review article",

abstract = "A rapid review is a synthesis of available evidence in which some components of the review process are modified slightly to shorten the process. This will require tight control as well as day-to-day scientific mentoring. The typical rapid review has a focused research question covering a narrow and well-defined clinical problem. With a continuous focus on some elements in the planning and production phases, it is realistic to produce a rapid scoping or systematic review with or without meta-analysis within three months without compromising on scientific quality.",

author = "Jacob Rosenberg and Siv Fonnes and Stina {\"O}berg and Kristoffer Andresen",

note = "Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.",

year = "2022",

language = "English",

volume = "69",

journal = "Danish Medical Journal",

issn = "2245-1919",

publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to produce a rapid systematic review - a review article

AU - Rosenberg, Jacob

AU - Fonnes, Siv

AU - Öberg, Stina

AU - Andresen, Kristoffer

N1 - Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - A rapid review is a synthesis of available evidence in which some components of the review process are modified slightly to shorten the process. This will require tight control as well as day-to-day scientific mentoring. The typical rapid review has a focused research question covering a narrow and well-defined clinical problem. With a continuous focus on some elements in the planning and production phases, it is realistic to produce a rapid scoping or systematic review with or without meta-analysis within three months without compromising on scientific quality.

AB - A rapid review is a synthesis of available evidence in which some components of the review process are modified slightly to shorten the process. This will require tight control as well as day-to-day scientific mentoring. The typical rapid review has a focused research question covering a narrow and well-defined clinical problem. With a continuous focus on some elements in the planning and production phases, it is realistic to produce a rapid scoping or systematic review with or without meta-analysis within three months without compromising on scientific quality.

M3 - Review

C2 - 36458606

VL - 69

JO - Danish Medical Journal

JF - Danish Medical Journal

SN - 2245-1919

IS - 12

M1 - A06220369

ER -