TY - JOUR
T1 - Human-AI collaboration for ultrasound diagnosis of thyroid nodules
T2 - a clinical trial
AU - Edström, Axel Bukhave
AU - Makouei, Fatemeh
AU - Wennervaldt, Kasper
AU - Lomholt, Anne Fog
AU - Kaltoft, Mikkel
AU - Melchiors, Jacob
AU - Hvilsom, Gitte Bjørn
AU - Bech, Magne
AU - Tolsgaard, Martin
AU - Todsen, Tobias
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Purpose: This clinical trial examined how the articifial intelligence (AI)-based diagnostics system S-Detect for Thyroid influences the ultrasound diagnostic work-up of thyroid ultrasound (US) performed by different US users in clinical practice and how different US users influences the diagnostic accuracy of S-Detect. Methods: We conducted a clinical trial with 20 participants, including medical students, US novice physicians, and US experienced physicians. Five patients with thyroid nodules (one malignant and four benign) volunteered to undergo a thyroid US scan performed by all 20 participants using the same US systems with S-Detect installed. Participants performed a focused thyroid US on each patient case and made a nodule classification according to the European Thyroid Imaging Reporting And Data System (EU-TIRADS). They then performed a S-Detect analysis of the same nodule and were asked to re-evaluate their EU-TIRADS reporting. From the EU-TIRADS assessments by participants, we derived a biopsy recommendation outcome of whether fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was recommended. Results: The mean diagnostic accuracy for S-Detect was 71.3% (range 40–100%) among all participants, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.31). The accuracy of our biopsy recommendation outcome was 69.8% before and 69.2% after AI for all participants (p = 0.75). Conclusion: In this trial, we did not find S-Detect to improve the thyroid diagnostic work-up in clinical practice among novice and intermediate ultrasound operators. However, the operator had a substantial impact on the AI-generated ultrasound diagnosis, with a variation in diagnostic accuracy from 40 to 100%, despite the same patients and ultrasound machines being used in the trial.
AB - Purpose: This clinical trial examined how the articifial intelligence (AI)-based diagnostics system S-Detect for Thyroid influences the ultrasound diagnostic work-up of thyroid ultrasound (US) performed by different US users in clinical practice and how different US users influences the diagnostic accuracy of S-Detect. Methods: We conducted a clinical trial with 20 participants, including medical students, US novice physicians, and US experienced physicians. Five patients with thyroid nodules (one malignant and four benign) volunteered to undergo a thyroid US scan performed by all 20 participants using the same US systems with S-Detect installed. Participants performed a focused thyroid US on each patient case and made a nodule classification according to the European Thyroid Imaging Reporting And Data System (EU-TIRADS). They then performed a S-Detect analysis of the same nodule and were asked to re-evaluate their EU-TIRADS reporting. From the EU-TIRADS assessments by participants, we derived a biopsy recommendation outcome of whether fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was recommended. Results: The mean diagnostic accuracy for S-Detect was 71.3% (range 40–100%) among all participants, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.31). The accuracy of our biopsy recommendation outcome was 69.8% before and 69.2% after AI for all participants (p = 0.75). Conclusion: In this trial, we did not find S-Detect to improve the thyroid diagnostic work-up in clinical practice among novice and intermediate ultrasound operators. However, the operator had a substantial impact on the AI-generated ultrasound diagnosis, with a variation in diagnostic accuracy from 40 to 100%, despite the same patients and ultrasound machines being used in the trial.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD)
KW - Diagnostic ultrasound
KW - Thyroid cancer
KW - Thyroid lesions
U2 - 10.1007/s00405-025-09236-9
DO - 10.1007/s00405-025-09236-9
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39920508
AN - SCOPUS:85218816065
SN - 0937-4477
JO - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
JF - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
M1 - e1201
ER -