Inconsistent reporting of surrogate outcomes in randomised clinical trials: cohort study

Jeppe Lerche La Cour, Jesper Brok, Peter C Gøtzsche

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

Abstract

To assess if authors of randomised clinical trials convey the fact that they have used surrogate outcomes and discussed their validity.

@article{437c843258be424abfddc884b39e29c7,

title = "Inconsistent reporting of surrogate outcomes in randomised clinical trials: cohort study",

abstract = "To assess if authors of randomised clinical trials convey the fact that they have used surrogate outcomes and discussed their validity.",

author = "{La Cour}, {Jeppe Lerche} and Jesper Brok and G{\o}tzsche, {Peter C}",

year = "2010",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "341",

pages = "c3653",

journal = "B M J",

issn = "0959-8146",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inconsistent reporting of surrogate outcomes in randomised clinical trials: cohort study

AU - La Cour, Jeppe Lerche

AU - Brok, Jesper

AU - Gøtzsche, Peter C

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - To assess if authors of randomised clinical trials convey the fact that they have used surrogate outcomes and discussed their validity.

AB - To assess if authors of randomised clinical trials convey the fact that they have used surrogate outcomes and discussed their validity.

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0959-8146

VL - 341

SP - c3653

JO - B M J

JF - B M J

ER -