TY - JOUR
T1 - Inter-observer agreement, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of animal-based indicators of young lamb welfare
AU - Phythian, C. J.
AU - Toft, N.
AU - Cripps, P. J.
AU - Michalopoulou, E.
AU - Winter, A. C.
AU - Jones, P. H.
AU - Grove-White, D.
AU - Duncan, J. S.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - A scientific literature review and consensus of expert opinion used the welfare definitions provided by the Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC) Five Freedoms as the framework for selecting a set of animal-based indicators that were sensitive to the current on-farm welfare issues of young lambs (aged = 0.70, Sp >= 0.98), stimulation (kappa = 0.57, Se = 0.30 to 0.77, Sp >= 0.98), shivering (kappa = 0.55, Se = 037 to 0.85, Sp >= 0.99), standing ability (0.54, Se >= 0.80, Sp >= 0.99), posture (kappa = 0.45, Se 0.56, Sp = 0.99), abdominal fill (kappa = 0.44, Se = 0.39 to 0.98, Sp = 0.99), body condition (kappa = 0.72, Se >= 0.38 to 0.90, Sp = 0.99), lameness (kappa = 0.68, Se > 0.73, Sp = 1.00), and eye condition (kappa = 0.72, Se >= 0.86, Sp = 0.99). LCA predicted that randomly selected observers had Se > 0.77 (acceptable), and Sp 0.98 (high) for assessments of demeanour, lameness, abdominal fill posture, body condition and eye condition. The diagnostic performance of some indicators was influenced by the composition of the study population, and it would be useful to test the indicators on lambs with a greater level of outcomes associated with poor welfare. The findings presented in this paper could be applied in the selection of valid, reliable and feasible indicators used for the purposes of on-farm assessments of lamb welfare.
AB - A scientific literature review and consensus of expert opinion used the welfare definitions provided by the Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC) Five Freedoms as the framework for selecting a set of animal-based indicators that were sensitive to the current on-farm welfare issues of young lambs (aged = 0.70, Sp >= 0.98), stimulation (kappa = 0.57, Se = 0.30 to 0.77, Sp >= 0.98), shivering (kappa = 0.55, Se = 037 to 0.85, Sp >= 0.99), standing ability (0.54, Se >= 0.80, Sp >= 0.99), posture (kappa = 0.45, Se 0.56, Sp = 0.99), abdominal fill (kappa = 0.44, Se = 0.39 to 0.98, Sp = 0.99), body condition (kappa = 0.72, Se >= 0.38 to 0.90, Sp = 0.99), lameness (kappa = 0.68, Se > 0.73, Sp = 1.00), and eye condition (kappa = 0.72, Se >= 0.86, Sp = 0.99). LCA predicted that randomly selected observers had Se > 0.77 (acceptable), and Sp 0.98 (high) for assessments of demeanour, lameness, abdominal fill posture, body condition and eye condition. The diagnostic performance of some indicators was influenced by the composition of the study population, and it would be useful to test the indicators on lambs with a greater level of outcomes associated with poor welfare. The findings presented in this paper could be applied in the selection of valid, reliable and feasible indicators used for the purposes of on-farm assessments of lamb welfare.
U2 - 10.1017/S1751731113000487
DO - 10.1017/S1751731113000487
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 23561038
SN - 1751-7311
VL - 7
SP - 1182
EP - 1190
JO - Animal
JF - Animal
IS - 7
ER -