Interchangeability of biosimilars: A study of expert views and visions regarding the science and substitution

Louise C. Druedahl*, Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong, Timo Minssen, Hans Hoogland, Marie Louise (Marieke) De Bruin, Marco van de Weert, Anna Birna Almarsdóttir

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

58 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Healthcare systems have reached a critical point regarding the question of whether biosimilar substitution should become common practice. To move the discussion forward, the study objective was to investigate the views of experts from medicines agencies and the pharmaceutical industry on the science underpinning interchangeability of biosimilars. We conducted an empirical qualitative study using semi-structured interviews informed by a cross-disciplinary approach encompassing regulatory science, law, and pharmaceutical policy. In total 25 individuals with experience within biologics participated during September 2018–August 2019. Eight participants were EU national medicines authority regulators, and had pharmaceutical industry background: five from two originator-only companies, four from two companies with both biosimilar and originator products, and eight from seven biosimilar-only companies. Two analysts independently conducted inductive content analysis, resulting in data-driven themes capturing the meaning of the data. The participants reported that interchangeability was more than a scientific question of likeness between biosimilar and reference products: it also pertained to regulatory practices and trust. Participants were overall confident in the science behind exchanging biosimilar products for the reference products via switching, i.e., with physician involvement. However, their opinions differed regarding the scientific risk associated with biosimilar substitution, i.e., without physician involvement. Almost all participants saw no need for additional scientific data to support substitution. Moreover, the participants did not believe that switching studies, as required in the US, were appropriate for obtaining scientific certainty due to their small size. It is unclear why biosimilar switching is viewed as scientifically safer than substitution; therefore, we expect greater policy debate on biosimilar substitution in the near future. We urge European and UK policymakers and regulators to clarify their visions for biosimilar substitution; the positions of these two frontrunners are likely to influence other jurisdictions on the future of biosimilar use.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPLOS One
Vol/bind17
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)1-13
Antal sider13
ISSN1932-6203
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Emneord

  • Det Juridiske Fakultet
  • regulatory science
  • Regulatory Politics
  • Law & Technonology
  • Emperical legal studies
  • Interchangeability
  • Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet
  • Biotech drugs
  • biosimilar pharmaceuticals
  • Switching
  • Substitution

Citationsformater