Judicial Opinion 130

David R. Arahal; Carolee T. Bull; Henrik Christensen; Maria Chuvochina; Christopher Dunlap; Maria Del Carmen Montero-Calasanz; Charles T. Parker; Peter Vandamme; Antonio Ventosa; Stefano Ventura; Peter Young; Markus Göker

doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.006414

Judicial Opinion 130

David R. Arahal
, Carolee T. Bull
, Henrik Christensen
, Maria Chuvochina
, Christopher Dunlap
, Maria Del Carmen Montero-Calasanz
, Charles T. Parker
, Peter Vandamme
, Antonio Ventosa
, Stefano Ventura
, Peter Young
, Markus Göker^*

^*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Sektion, Veterinary Clinical Microbiology

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Opinion 130 deals with a Request for an Opinion asking the Judicial Commission to clarify whether the genus name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate. The Request is approved and an answer is given. The name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate because it is a later homonym of the validly published cyanobacterial name Rhodococcus Hansgirg 1884. The Judicial Commission also clarifies that it has the means to resolve such cases by conserving a name over an earlier homonym. It is concluded that the name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is significantly more important than the name Rhodococcus Hansgirg 1884 and therefore the former is conserved over the latter. This makes the name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) legitimate.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Artikelnummer	006414
Tidsskrift	International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
Vol/bind	74
Udgave nummer	6
Antal sider	5
ISSN	1466-5026
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.006414
Status	Udgivet - 2024

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
C.T.B.\u2019s work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Federal Appropriations under project #PEN04926 (accession 7006350), which is gratefully acknowledged. M.C. was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP220100900). S.V.\u2019s work was supported by funding from NBFC, Italian National Biodiversity Future Center (MUR-PNRR, Mission 4.2. Investment 1.4, Project CN00000033), which is gratefully acknowledged.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, Microbiology Society. All rights reserved.

Finansiering

C.T.B.\u2019s work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Federal Appropriations under project #PEN04926 (accession 7006350), which is gratefully acknowledged. M.C. was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP220100900). S.V.\u2019s work was supported by funding from NBFC, Italian National Biodiversity Future Center (MUR-PNRR, Mission 4.2. Investment 1.4, Project CN00000033), which is gratefully acknowledged.

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1099/ijsem.0.006414Licens: CC BY

FulltextForlagets udgivne version, 202 KBLicens: CC BY

Biblioteksadgang?

Tjek tilgængelighed hos det Kgl. Bibliotek

Citationsformater

@article{3f1eb8b8d4bb40a6b1d477e3c3cbd7e8,

title = "Judicial Opinion 130",

abstract = "Opinion 130 deals with a Request for an Opinion asking the Judicial Commission to clarify whether the genus name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate. The Request is approved and an answer is given. The name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate because it is a later homonym of the validly published cyanobacterial name Rhodococcus Hansgirg 1884. The Judicial Commission also clarifies that it has the means to resolve such cases by conserving a name over an earlier homonym. It is concluded that the name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is significantly more important than the name Rhodococcus Hansgirg 1884 and therefore the former is conserved over the latter. This makes the name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) legitimate.",

author = "Arahal, \{David R.\} and Bull, \{Carolee T.\} and Henrik Christensen and Maria Chuvochina and Christopher Dunlap and Montero-Calasanz, \{Maria Del Carmen\} and Parker, \{Charles T.\} and Peter Vandamme and Antonio Ventosa and Stefano Ventura and Peter Young and Markus G{\"o}ker",

note = "Funding Information: C.T.B.\textbackslash{}u2019s work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Federal Appropriations under project \#PEN04926 (accession 7006350), which is gratefully acknowledged. M.C. was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP220100900). S.V.\textbackslash{}u2019s work was supported by funding from NBFC, Italian National Biodiversity Future Center (MUR-PNRR, Mission 4.2. Investment 1.4, Project CN00000033), which is gratefully acknowledged. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024, Microbiology Society. All rights reserved.",

year = "2024",

doi = "10.1099/ijsem.0.006414",

language = "English",

volume = "74",

journal = "International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology",

issn = "1466-5026",

publisher = "Microbiology Society",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judicial Opinion 130

AU - Arahal, David R.

AU - Bull, Carolee T.

AU - Christensen, Henrik

AU - Chuvochina, Maria

AU - Dunlap, Christopher

AU - Montero-Calasanz, Maria Del Carmen

AU - Parker, Charles T.

AU - Vandamme, Peter

AU - Ventosa, Antonio

AU - Ventura, Stefano

AU - Young, Peter

AU - Göker, Markus

N1 - Funding Information: C.T.B.\u2019s work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Federal Appropriations under project #PEN04926 (accession 7006350), which is gratefully acknowledged. M.C. was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP220100900). S.V.\u2019s work was supported by funding from NBFC, Italian National Biodiversity Future Center (MUR-PNRR, Mission 4.2. Investment 1.4, Project CN00000033), which is gratefully acknowledged. Publisher Copyright: © 2024, Microbiology Society. All rights reserved.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Opinion 130 deals with a Request for an Opinion asking the Judicial Commission to clarify whether the genus name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate. The Request is approved and an answer is given. The name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate because it is a later homonym of the validly published cyanobacterial name Rhodococcus Hansgirg 1884. The Judicial Commission also clarifies that it has the means to resolve such cases by conserving a name over an earlier homonym. It is concluded that the name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is significantly more important than the name Rhodococcus Hansgirg 1884 and therefore the former is conserved over the latter. This makes the name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) legitimate.

AB - Opinion 130 deals with a Request for an Opinion asking the Judicial Commission to clarify whether the genus name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate. The Request is approved and an answer is given. The name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate because it is a later homonym of the validly published cyanobacterial name Rhodococcus Hansgirg 1884. The Judicial Commission also clarifies that it has the means to resolve such cases by conserving a name over an earlier homonym. It is concluded that the name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is significantly more important than the name Rhodococcus Hansgirg 1884 and therefore the former is conserved over the latter. This makes the name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) legitimate.

U2 - 10.1099/ijsem.0.006414

DO - 10.1099/ijsem.0.006414

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38841989

AN - SCOPUS:85195283384

SN - 1466-5026

VL - 74

JO - International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

JF - International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

IS - 6

M1 - 006414

ER -