Abstract
Introduction
Depression is the dominant phase in bipolar disorder, but the available treatments are scarce. Lithium is a first-line option in several guidelines despite limited evidence, whereas cariprazine has a well-documented efficacy for depressive episodes. By comparing lithium and cariprazine in terms of efficacy and tolerability, we aim to contribute to an evidence-based positioning of lithium in future guidelines.
Methods and analysis
An open label, randomised, multicentre, investigator-sponsored comparison of lithium versus cariprazine with a treatment duration of 8 weeks. Participants are aged 18–65 years and are suffering from a depressive episode as part of bipolar disorder, type 1 or 2. The primary outcome is the difference between the two groups in change from baseline to endpoint on Hamilton depression scale, 6 item version, based on the modified intention-to-treat population. Continuous variables will be analysed by using two-sided t-tests and mixed effects models. For categorical measures, χ2 tests and multivariable models will be applied. Secondary outcomes include AEs and measures of well-being, depressive, manic and suicidal symptoms, as well as cognitive function. The study is powered as a superiority trial, with a calculated study population of 122 participants.
Ethics and dissemination
Protocol has been approved by the regional ethical committee N-20220007 and European Medicines Agency. All participants provide written informed consent. The protocol was written according to Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials 2013 guidelines. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed international journals.
Trial registration number
EU-CTR, 2024-517170-20-01; NCT05913947.
Depression is the dominant phase in bipolar disorder, but the available treatments are scarce. Lithium is a first-line option in several guidelines despite limited evidence, whereas cariprazine has a well-documented efficacy for depressive episodes. By comparing lithium and cariprazine in terms of efficacy and tolerability, we aim to contribute to an evidence-based positioning of lithium in future guidelines.
Methods and analysis
An open label, randomised, multicentre, investigator-sponsored comparison of lithium versus cariprazine with a treatment duration of 8 weeks. Participants are aged 18–65 years and are suffering from a depressive episode as part of bipolar disorder, type 1 or 2. The primary outcome is the difference between the two groups in change from baseline to endpoint on Hamilton depression scale, 6 item version, based on the modified intention-to-treat population. Continuous variables will be analysed by using two-sided t-tests and mixed effects models. For categorical measures, χ2 tests and multivariable models will be applied. Secondary outcomes include AEs and measures of well-being, depressive, manic and suicidal symptoms, as well as cognitive function. The study is powered as a superiority trial, with a calculated study population of 122 participants.
Ethics and dissemination
Protocol has been approved by the regional ethical committee N-20220007 and European Medicines Agency. All participants provide written informed consent. The protocol was written according to Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials 2013 guidelines. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed international journals.
Trial registration number
EU-CTR, 2024-517170-20-01; NCT05913947.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Artikelnummer | e102406 |
| Tidsskrift | BMJ Open |
| Vol/bind | 15 |
| Udgave nummer | 8 |
| Antal sider | 9 |
| ISSN | 2044-6055 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 2025 |
Bibliografisk note
Publisher Copyright:© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
Citationsformater
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS