Long-term mortality and health-related quality of life with lower versus higher oxygenation targets in intensive care unit patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxaemia

Elena Crescioli*, Frederik Mølgaard Nielsen, Anne Marie Bunzel, Anne Sofie Broberg Eriksen, Martin Siegemund, Lone Musaeus Poulsen, Anne Sofie Andreasen, Morten Heiberg Bestle, Susanne Andi Iversen, Anne Craveiro Brøchner, Thorbjørn Grøfte, Thomas Hildebrandt, Jon Henrik Laake, Maj Brit Nørregaard Kjær, Theis Lange, Anders Perner, Thomas Lass Klitgaard, Olav Lilleholt Schjørring, Bodil Steen Rasmussen

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

1 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate one-year outcomes of lower versus higher oxygenation targets in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and severe hypoxaemia.

Methods
We conducted pre-planned analyses of one-year mortality and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the Handling Oxygenation Targets in COVID-19 trial. The trial randomised 726 ICU patients with COVID-19 and hypoxaemia to partial pressure of arterial oxygen targets of 8 kPa (60 mmHg) versus 12 kPa (90 mmHg) during ICU stay up to 90 days, including readmissions. HRQoL was assessed using EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) and 5-level 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Outcomes were analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Non-survivors were assigned the worst possible score (zero), and multiple imputation was applied for missing EQ-VAS values.

Results
We obtained one-year vital status for 691/726 (95.2%) of patients and HRQoL data for 642/726 (88.4%). At one year, 117/348 (33.6%) of patients in the lower-oxygenation group had died compared to 134/343 (39.1%) in the higher-oxygenation group (adjusted risk ratio: 0.85; 98.6% confidence interval (CI) 0.66–1.09; p = 0.11). Median EQ-VAS was 50 (interquartile range, 0–80) versus 40 (0–75) (adjusted mean difference: 4.8; 98.6% CI  − 2.2 to 11.9; p = 0.09) and EQ-5D-5L index values were 0.61 (0–0.81) in the lower-oxygenation group versus 0.43 (0–0.79) (p = 0.20) in the higher-oxygenation group, respectively.

Conclusion
Among adult ICU patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxaemia, one-year mortality results were most compatible with benefit of the lower oxygenation target, which did not appear to result in more survivors with poor quality of life.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftIntensive Care Medicine
Vol/bind50
Sider (fra-til)1603–1613
Antal sider11
ISSN0342-4642
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2024

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
Open access funding provided by Aalborg University Hospital. The trial was funded by the Danish Ministry of Education and Science and Supported by the Research Council at Aalborg University Hospital. Funders had no role in the design and conduct of the trial; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; nor the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Funding Information:
The Department of Intensive Care at Rigshospitalet (AP, MNK) received funding from Sygeforsikringen \u201CDanmark\u201D, The Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Ehrenreich Foundation, the Becketts Foundation, and AM-Pharma. TL has served in Data and Safety Monitoring Board for Novo Nordisk and Leo Pharma, respectively: the studies were unrelated to the present study.

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Citationsformater