Abstract
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Heart Rhythm |
Vol/bind | 4 |
Udgave nummer | 3 |
Sider (fra-til) | 308-13 |
Antal sider | 5 |
ISSN | 1547-5271 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 2006 |
Bibliografisk note
Keywords: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Bundle-Branch Block; Captopril; Electrocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Predictive Value of Tests; Proportional Hazards Models; Research Design; Risk Factors; Stroke Volume; Survival Analysis; Survivors; Tetrazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Valine; Ventricular Dysfunction, LeftAdgang til dokumentet
Citationsformater
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
I: Heart Rhythm, Bind 4, Nr. 3, 2006, s. 308-13.
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch block in high-risk survivors of acute myocardial infarction: the VALIANT experience
AU - Stephenson, Kent
AU - Skali, Hicham
AU - McMurray, John J V
AU - Velazquez, Eric J
AU - Aylward, Philip G
AU - Køber, Lars Valeur
AU - Van de Werf, Frans
AU - White, Harvey D
AU - Pieper, Karen S
AU - Califf, Robert M
AU - Solomon, Scott D
AU - Pfeffer, Marc A
N1 - Keywords: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Bundle-Branch Block; Captopril; Electrocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Predictive Value of Tests; Proportional Hazards Models; Research Design; Risk Factors; Stroke Volume; Survival Analysis; Survivors; Tetrazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Valine; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - BACKGROUND: In survivors of myocardial infarction (MI), new left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with adverse outcomes, but its impact is not well described in post-MI patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and/or heart failure (HF). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine if new LBBB is an independent predictor of long-term fatal and nonfatal outcomes in high-risk survivors of MI by reviewing data from the VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion (VALIANT) trial. METHODS: In VALIANT, 14,703 patients with LV systolic dysfunction and/or HF were randomized to valsartan, captopril, or both a mean of 5 days after MI. Baseline ECG data were available from 14,259 patients. We assessed the predictive value of new LBBB for death and major cardiovascular outcomes after 3 years, adjusting for multiple baseline covariates including LV ejection fraction. RESULTS: At follow-up, patients with new LBBB (608 [4.2%]) compared with patients without new LBBB had more comorbidities and increased adjusted risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-1.6), cardiovascular death (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.7), HF (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6), MI (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9), and the composite of death, HF, or MI (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.6). CONCLUSION: In post-MI survivors with LV systolic dysfunction and/or HF, new LBBB was an independent predictor of all major adverse cardiovascular outcomes during long-term follow-up. This readily available ECG marker should be considered a major risk factor for long-term cardiovascular complications in high-risk patients after MI.
AB - BACKGROUND: In survivors of myocardial infarction (MI), new left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with adverse outcomes, but its impact is not well described in post-MI patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and/or heart failure (HF). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine if new LBBB is an independent predictor of long-term fatal and nonfatal outcomes in high-risk survivors of MI by reviewing data from the VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion (VALIANT) trial. METHODS: In VALIANT, 14,703 patients with LV systolic dysfunction and/or HF were randomized to valsartan, captopril, or both a mean of 5 days after MI. Baseline ECG data were available from 14,259 patients. We assessed the predictive value of new LBBB for death and major cardiovascular outcomes after 3 years, adjusting for multiple baseline covariates including LV ejection fraction. RESULTS: At follow-up, patients with new LBBB (608 [4.2%]) compared with patients without new LBBB had more comorbidities and increased adjusted risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-1.6), cardiovascular death (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.7), HF (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6), MI (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9), and the composite of death, HF, or MI (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.6). CONCLUSION: In post-MI survivors with LV systolic dysfunction and/or HF, new LBBB was an independent predictor of all major adverse cardiovascular outcomes during long-term follow-up. This readily available ECG marker should be considered a major risk factor for long-term cardiovascular complications in high-risk patients after MI.
U2 - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.11.021
DO - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.11.021
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 17341394
SN - 1547-5271
VL - 4
SP - 308
EP - 313
JO - Heart Rhythm
JF - Heart Rhythm
IS - 3
ER -