Abstract
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine |
Vol/bind | 32 |
Udgave nummer | 3 |
Sider (fra-til) | 226-36 |
Antal sider | 11 |
ISSN | 1079-0268 |
Status | Udgivet - 2009 |
Bibliografisk note
Keywords: Adult; Aged; Ejaculation; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Penile Erection; Photoplethysmography; Quality of Life; Questionnaires; Severity of Illness Index; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological; Spinal Cord Injuries; Vagina; Young AdultCitationsformater
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
Measurement of sexual functioning after spinal cord injury: preferred instruments. / Alexander, Marcalee Sipski; Brackett, Nancy L; Bodner, Donald; Elliott, Stacy; Jackson, Amie; Sønksen, Jens Otto Reimers; National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
I: Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, Bind 32, Nr. 3, 2009, s. 226-36.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Measurement of sexual functioning after spinal cord injury: preferred instruments
AU - Alexander, Marcalee Sipski
AU - Brackett, Nancy L
AU - Bodner, Donald
AU - Elliott, Stacy
AU - Jackson, Amie
AU - Sønksen, Jens Otto Reimers
AU - National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
N1 - Keywords: Adult; Aged; Ejaculation; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Penile Erection; Photoplethysmography; Quality of Life; Questionnaires; Severity of Illness Index; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological; Spinal Cord Injuries; Vagina; Young Adult
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of certain instruments to assess sexuality and fertility after SCI, an expert panel identified key areas to study and evaluated available instruments. These were rated according to certain predefined criteria. METHODS: The authors divided sexual issues into male and female sexual function, male reproductive function, and female reproductive function. The instruments that have been used most frequently to measure these aspects of sexual function over the past 5 years were identified by expert consensus. Finally, these instruments were subjected to a critical review. RESULTS: The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), measurement of vaginal pulse amplitude (VPA), the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and the measurement of ejaculatory function and semen quality were considered appropriate measures to assess sexual responses and reproductive function after SCI. There were no measures identified to assess female reproductive function. CONCLUSIONS: For clinical trials aiming to improve sexual function after SCI, the FSFI or the IIEF is currently preferred. Although VPA is an appropriate means to assess female sexual responses, it is only useful for laboratory studies and is too invasive for use in clinical trials. For assessment of male fertility potential, assessment of ejaculatory capacity and semen analysis are recommended.
AB - BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of certain instruments to assess sexuality and fertility after SCI, an expert panel identified key areas to study and evaluated available instruments. These were rated according to certain predefined criteria. METHODS: The authors divided sexual issues into male and female sexual function, male reproductive function, and female reproductive function. The instruments that have been used most frequently to measure these aspects of sexual function over the past 5 years were identified by expert consensus. Finally, these instruments were subjected to a critical review. RESULTS: The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), measurement of vaginal pulse amplitude (VPA), the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and the measurement of ejaculatory function and semen quality were considered appropriate measures to assess sexual responses and reproductive function after SCI. There were no measures identified to assess female reproductive function. CONCLUSIONS: For clinical trials aiming to improve sexual function after SCI, the FSFI or the IIEF is currently preferred. Although VPA is an appropriate means to assess female sexual responses, it is only useful for laboratory studies and is too invasive for use in clinical trials. For assessment of male fertility potential, assessment of ejaculatory capacity and semen analysis are recommended.
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 19810624
VL - 32
SP - 226
EP - 236
JO - Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
JF - Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
SN - 1079-0268
IS - 3
ER -