Methodological and disciplinary competence and insecurity in qualitative research

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

Abstract

This chapter is based on discussions at a workshop at the Nordic Social Pharmacy Conference in 2019, named How do we know it’s good? A workshop on quality criteria in qualitative social and clinical pharmacy research. After an introduction, the chapter continues with a glance at two different epistemologies. Thereafter, reflections on the challenges that many social pharmacy researchers meet as they come from a natural science background into qualitative research are presented. Specific aspects presented and discussed are: methodological and disciplinary competence and insecurity, reflexivity, transparency, checklists, quality criteria, sample size, and saturation.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelContemporary research methods in pharmacy and health services
RedaktørerShane P. Desselle, Victoria Garcia-Cárdenas, Claire Anderson, Parisa Aslani, Aleda M.H. Chen, Timothy F. Chen
ForlagAcademic Press
Publikationsdato2022
Udgave1
Sider567-574
Kapitel39
ISBN (Trykt)9780323918886
ISBN (Elektronisk)9780323914260
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Citationsformater