TY - JOUR
T1 - Methylchloroisothiazolinone and Methylisothiazolinone 10 Years After Regulation
T2 - A Case Story of Liquid Soaps and Shampoos
AU - Pedersen, Mathias Krogh
AU - Schwensen, Jakob Ferløv Baselius
AU - Alfonso, Jose Hernán
AU - Kirkeby, Christel Søgaard
AU - Müller, Stine
AU - Mollerup, Steen
AU - Selvestrel, Gianluca
AU - Rudén, Christina
AU - Wilks, Martin F.
AU - Johansen, Jeanne Duus
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Background: Contact allergy to methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI) and methylisothiazolinone (MI) remains common in the EU despite regulation. Objectives: To assess the extent of use of MCI/MI and MI in cosmetic products on the Danish market, identify product categories involved and evaluate compliance of rinse-off products with the 15 ppm limit. Materials and Methods: Products listing MCI/MI or MI were identified through Kemiluppen, a Danish database of marketed cosmetics. Thirty products (16 shampoos and 14 liquid soaps) were examined using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: 25 labelled as containing MCI/MI or MI, 5 unlabelled. Results: In total, 257 cosmetic products containing MCI/MI or MI were identified, primarily shampoos (127), conditioners (98) and liquid soaps (8). Chemical analysis showed that 2 of 25 labelled products (8%) exceeded the 15 ppm limit, and 4 products did not meet the required 3:1 MCI/MI ratio. Conclusion: MCI/MI is used infrequently in cosmetic products. All, except two products complied with the limit in the regulation. Given the continued occurrence of contact allergy, this indicates that the limit (15 ppm) may be too high to be sufficiently protective. Further investigation into MCI/MI use in cosmetic products is warranted, alongside more proactive risk assessment and management strategies.
AB - Background: Contact allergy to methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI) and methylisothiazolinone (MI) remains common in the EU despite regulation. Objectives: To assess the extent of use of MCI/MI and MI in cosmetic products on the Danish market, identify product categories involved and evaluate compliance of rinse-off products with the 15 ppm limit. Materials and Methods: Products listing MCI/MI or MI were identified through Kemiluppen, a Danish database of marketed cosmetics. Thirty products (16 shampoos and 14 liquid soaps) were examined using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: 25 labelled as containing MCI/MI or MI, 5 unlabelled. Results: In total, 257 cosmetic products containing MCI/MI or MI were identified, primarily shampoos (127), conditioners (98) and liquid soaps (8). Chemical analysis showed that 2 of 25 labelled products (8%) exceeded the 15 ppm limit, and 4 products did not meet the required 3:1 MCI/MI ratio. Conclusion: MCI/MI is used infrequently in cosmetic products. All, except two products complied with the limit in the regulation. Given the continued occurrence of contact allergy, this indicates that the limit (15 ppm) may be too high to be sufficiently protective. Further investigation into MCI/MI use in cosmetic products is warranted, alongside more proactive risk assessment and management strategies.
KW - contact allergy
KW - cosmetics
KW - methylchloroisothiazolinone
KW - methylisothiazolinone
U2 - 10.1111/cod.70202
DO - 10.1111/cod.70202
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 42300206
AN - SCOPUS:105041855571
SN - 0105-1873
VL - 95
SP - 405
EP - 412
JO - Contact Dermatitis
JF - Contact Dermatitis
IS - 4
ER -