Microbial inactivation and shelf life comparison of 'cold' hurdle processing with pulsed electric fields and microfiltration, and conventional thermal pasteurisation in skim milk

M. Walkling-Ribeiro*, O. Rodríguez-González, S. Jayaram, M. W. Griffiths

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

72 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Thermal pasteurisation (TP) is the established food technology for commercial processing of milk. However, degradation of valuable nutrients in milk and its sensory characteristics occurs during TP due to substantial heat exposure. Pulsed electric fields (PEF) and microfiltration (MF) both represent emerging food processing technologies allowing gentle milk preservation at lower temperatures and shorter treatment times for similar, or better, microbial inactivation and shelf stability when applied in a hurdle approach compared to TP. Incubated raw milk was used as an inoculum for the enrichment of skim milk with native microorganisms before PEF, MF, and TP processing. Inoculated milk was PEF-processed at electric field strengths between 16 and 42kV/cm for treatment times from 612 to 2105μs; accounting for energy densities between 407 and 815kJ/L, while MF was applied with a transmembrane flux of 660L/h m2. Milk was TP-treated at 75°C for 24s. Comparing PEF, MF, and TP for the reduction of the native microbial load in milk led to a 4.6 log10 CFU/mL reduction in count for TP, which was similar to 3.7 log10 CFU/mL obtained by MF (P≥0.05), and more effective than the 2.5 log10 CFU/mL inactivation achieved by PEF inactivation (at 815kJ/L (P<0.05)). Combined processing with MF followed by PEF (MF/PEF) produced a 4.1 (at 407 and 632kJ/L), 4.4 (at 668kJ/L) and 4.8 (at 815kJ/L) log10 CFU/mL reduction in count of the milk microorganisms, which was comparable to that of TP (P≥0.05). Reversed processing (PEF/MF) achieved comparable reductions of 4.9, 5.3 and 5.7 log10 CFU/mL (at 407, 632 and 668kJ/L, respectively (P≥0.05)) and a higher inactivation of 7.1 log10 (at 815kJ/mL (P<0.05)) in milk than for TP. Microbial shelf life of PEF/MF-treated (815kJ/L) and TP-treated milk stored at 4°C was analysed over 35days for total aerobic; enterobacteria; yeasts and moulds; lactobacilli; psychrotroph; thermoduric psychrotroph, mesophilic, and thermophilic; and staphylococci counts. For both PEF/MF and TP-treated milk an overall shelf stability of 7days was observed based on total aerobic counts (P≥0.05). Milk hurdle processing with PEF/MF at its most effective treatment parameters produced greater microbial inactivation and overall similar shelf stability at lower processing temperatures compared to TP. With higher field strength, shorter treatment time, larger energy density, and rising temperature the efficacy of PEF/MF increased contrary to MF/PEF. Thus, PEF/MF represents a potential alternative for 'cold' pasteurisation of milk with improved quality.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Food Microbiology
Vol/bind144
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)379-386
Antal sider8
ISSN0168-1605
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2011
Udgivet eksterntJa

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Dairy Farmers of Ontario and the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada . In addition, the authors would also like to thank Gay Lea Foods for the supply of raw milk and the Guelph Food Technology Centre for the use of their microfiltration, homogenisation and heat exchanger units.

Citationsformater