TY - JOUR
T1 - Morton’s Neuroma or Intermetatarsal Bursitis—A Prospective Diagnostic Study of Intermetatarsal Pain
AU - Larsen, Sif Binder
AU - Offersen, Cecilie Mørck
AU - Dyrberg, Eva
AU - Johansen, Jens Kurt
AU - Lange, Naja Bjørslev
AU - Bech, Birthe Højlund
AU - Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
AU - Torp-Pedersen, Søren Tobias
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Intermetatarsal bursitis (IMB) is emerging as a diagnostic consideration for patients with forefoot pain. However, few investigations have been conducted into the incidence of IMB among patients with forefoot pain. The symptoms of IMB are described as mimicking those of Morton’s neuroma (MN). Currently, the best method to differentiate between MN and IMB is radiological evaluation. Based on this, the aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of IMB and MN in a prospective cohort of patients with intermetatarsal pain diagnosed with radiological evaluation and compared to a control group. Methods: This study included 26 patients and 13 controls. All participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) of one forefoot. Results: Among the 26 patients, 5 (19.2%) had MN and 14 (53.8%) had IMB on MRI compared to US, with which 25 (96.2%) cases of IMB and 0 with MN were identified. In the control group, both modalities found asymptomatic web space pathology in four cases (30.8%), and US identified normal intermetatarsal bursas in five cases. Additionally, our results indicate that MN patients have more severe pain and a longer history of pain compared to IMB patients. Conclusions: Based on our MRI results, we conclude that IMB is frequent in patients with intermetatarsal pain. Differentiation between MN and IMB with US is complex and should be performed with caution and an understanding of both conditions. Normal intermetatarsal bursas are also visible on US as hypoechoic but non-expansive masses.
AB - Background: Intermetatarsal bursitis (IMB) is emerging as a diagnostic consideration for patients with forefoot pain. However, few investigations have been conducted into the incidence of IMB among patients with forefoot pain. The symptoms of IMB are described as mimicking those of Morton’s neuroma (MN). Currently, the best method to differentiate between MN and IMB is radiological evaluation. Based on this, the aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of IMB and MN in a prospective cohort of patients with intermetatarsal pain diagnosed with radiological evaluation and compared to a control group. Methods: This study included 26 patients and 13 controls. All participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) of one forefoot. Results: Among the 26 patients, 5 (19.2%) had MN and 14 (53.8%) had IMB on MRI compared to US, with which 25 (96.2%) cases of IMB and 0 with MN were identified. In the control group, both modalities found asymptomatic web space pathology in four cases (30.8%), and US identified normal intermetatarsal bursas in five cases. Additionally, our results indicate that MN patients have more severe pain and a longer history of pain compared to IMB patients. Conclusions: Based on our MRI results, we conclude that IMB is frequent in patients with intermetatarsal pain. Differentiation between MN and IMB with US is complex and should be performed with caution and an understanding of both conditions. Normal intermetatarsal bursas are also visible on US as hypoechoic but non-expansive masses.
KW - diagnostic criteria
KW - intermetatarsal bursitis/bursa
KW - magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Morton’s neuroma
KW - prospective study
KW - ultrasound
KW - web space
U2 - 10.3390/diagnostics15111339
DO - 10.3390/diagnostics15111339
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 40506910
AN - SCOPUS:105007863436
SN - 2075-4418
VL - 15
JO - Diagnostics
JF - Diagnostics
IS - 11
M1 - 1339
ER -