Nintedanib plus docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

Sanjay Popat, Anders Mellemgaard, Kyle Fahrbach, Alison Martin, Maria Rizzo, Rolf Kaiser, Ingolf Griebsch, Martin Reck

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

34 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nintedanib plus docetaxel has proven an overall survival benefit over docetaxel monotherapy in second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology in the LUME-Lung 1 pivotal trial. No published trials have previously compared nintedanib plus docetaxel with agents – other than docetaxel – that are approved second-line treatments for non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS: The relative efficacy of nintedanib plus docetaxel versus second-line agents was evaluated by conducting a network meta-analysis of progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS: Nine suitable studies were identified. The estimated probability of nintedanib plus docetaxel being the best treatment with regard to overall survival was 70% (versus 16% for pemetrexed, 10% for docetaxel and 3% for erlotinib). Results for progression-free survival were similar.

CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology, results suggest that nintedanib plus docetaxel offers clinical benefit compared with docetaxel alone, when used as second-line treatment, and suggests that this combination may also add clinical benefit compared with erlotinib in this patient group.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftFuture Oncology
Vol/bind11
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)409-20
Antal sider12
ISSN1479-6694
DOI
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2015

Citationsformater