One year after Vanda, are diagnostics patents transforming into methods of treatment to overcome Mayo-based rejections?

Mateo Aboy*, Cristina Crespo, Kathleen Liddell, Neal Davey, Johnathan Liddicoat, Timo Minssen

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

3 Citationer (Scopus)
45 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

On the first anniversary of Vanda, 1) to what extent have legal arguments and claim amendments based on Vanda been effective in overcoming 35 USC 101 Mayo-based rejections?; and 2) How are applicants transforming diagnostic patent claims into method of treatment claims to overcome Mayo-based subject matter eligibility rejections?
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftNature Biotechnology
Vol/bind38
Sider (fra-til)279–283
Antal sider5
ISSN1087-0156
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2020

Emneord

  • Det Juridiske Fakultet

Citationsformater