Quality of life in the Danish general population--normative data and validity of WHOQOL-BREF using Rasch and item response theory models.

V Noerholm; M Groenvold; T Watt; J B Bjorner; N A Rasmussen; P Bech

Quality of life in the Danish general population--normative data and validity of WHOQOL-BREF using Rasch and item response theory models.

V Noerholm, M Groenvold, T Watt, J B Bjorner, N A Rasmussen, P Bech

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

118 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Udgivelsesdato: 2004-Mar

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Quality of Life Research
Vol/bind	13
Udgave nummer	2
Sider (fra-til)	531-40
Antal sider	9
ISSN	0962-9343
Status	Udgivet - 2004

Bibliografisk note

Keywords: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Attitude to Health; Denmark; Educational Status; Female; Health Status Indicators; Humans; Male; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Psychometrics; Quality of Life; Questionnaires; Registries; Regression Analysis; Sex Factors; World Health Organization

Citationsformater

@article{b18aedb0946611dd86a6000ea68e967b,

title = "Quality of life in the Danish general population--normative data and validity of WHOQOL-BREF using Rasch and item response theory models.",

abstract = "BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study was to investigate the construct validity of the WHOQOL-BREF by use of Rasch and Item Response Theory models and to examine the stability of the model across high/low scoring individuals, gender, education, and depressive illness. Furthermore, the objective of the study was to estimate the reference data for the quality of life questionnaire WHOQOL-BREF in the general Danish population and in subgroups defined by age, gender, and education. METHODS: Mail-out-mail-back questionnaires were sent to a randomly selected sample of the Danish general population. The response rate was 68.5%, and the sample reported here contained 1101 respondents: 578 women and 519 men (four respondents did not indicate their genders). RESULTS: Each of the four domains of the WHOQOL-BREF scale fitted a two-parameter IRT model, but did not fit the Rasch model. Due to multidimensionality, the total score of 26 items fitted neither model. Regression analysis was carried out, showing a level of explained variance of between 10 and 14%. The mean scores of the WHOQOL-BREF are reported as normative data for the general Danish population. CONCLUSION: The profile of the four WHOQOL-BREF domains is a more adequate expression of quality of life than the total score of all 26 items. Although none of the subscales are statistically sufficient measures of their domains, the profile scores seem to be adequate approximations to the optimal score.",

author = "V Noerholm and M Groenvold and T Watt and Bjorner, {J B} and Rasmussen, {N A} and P Bech",

note = "Keywords: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Attitude to Health; Denmark; Educational Status; Female; Health Status Indicators; Humans; Male; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Psychometrics; Quality of Life; Questionnaires; Registries; Regression Analysis; Sex Factors; World Health Organization",

year = "2004",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "531--40",

journal = "Quality of Life Research",

issn = "0962-9343",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of life in the Danish general population--normative data and validity of WHOQOL-BREF using Rasch and item response theory models.

AU - Noerholm, V

AU - Groenvold, M

AU - Watt, T

AU - Bjorner, J B

AU - Rasmussen, N A

AU - Bech, P

N1 - Keywords: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Attitude to Health; Denmark; Educational Status; Female; Health Status Indicators; Humans; Male; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Psychometrics; Quality of Life; Questionnaires; Registries; Regression Analysis; Sex Factors; World Health Organization

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study was to investigate the construct validity of the WHOQOL-BREF by use of Rasch and Item Response Theory models and to examine the stability of the model across high/low scoring individuals, gender, education, and depressive illness. Furthermore, the objective of the study was to estimate the reference data for the quality of life questionnaire WHOQOL-BREF in the general Danish population and in subgroups defined by age, gender, and education. METHODS: Mail-out-mail-back questionnaires were sent to a randomly selected sample of the Danish general population. The response rate was 68.5%, and the sample reported here contained 1101 respondents: 578 women and 519 men (four respondents did not indicate their genders). RESULTS: Each of the four domains of the WHOQOL-BREF scale fitted a two-parameter IRT model, but did not fit the Rasch model. Due to multidimensionality, the total score of 26 items fitted neither model. Regression analysis was carried out, showing a level of explained variance of between 10 and 14%. The mean scores of the WHOQOL-BREF are reported as normative data for the general Danish population. CONCLUSION: The profile of the four WHOQOL-BREF domains is a more adequate expression of quality of life than the total score of all 26 items. Although none of the subscales are statistically sufficient measures of their domains, the profile scores seem to be adequate approximations to the optimal score.

AB - BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study was to investigate the construct validity of the WHOQOL-BREF by use of Rasch and Item Response Theory models and to examine the stability of the model across high/low scoring individuals, gender, education, and depressive illness. Furthermore, the objective of the study was to estimate the reference data for the quality of life questionnaire WHOQOL-BREF in the general Danish population and in subgroups defined by age, gender, and education. METHODS: Mail-out-mail-back questionnaires were sent to a randomly selected sample of the Danish general population. The response rate was 68.5%, and the sample reported here contained 1101 respondents: 578 women and 519 men (four respondents did not indicate their genders). RESULTS: Each of the four domains of the WHOQOL-BREF scale fitted a two-parameter IRT model, but did not fit the Rasch model. Due to multidimensionality, the total score of 26 items fitted neither model. Regression analysis was carried out, showing a level of explained variance of between 10 and 14%. The mean scores of the WHOQOL-BREF are reported as normative data for the general Danish population. CONCLUSION: The profile of the four WHOQOL-BREF domains is a more adequate expression of quality of life than the total score of all 26 items. Although none of the subscales are statistically sufficient measures of their domains, the profile scores seem to be adequate approximations to the optimal score.

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 15085925

SN - 0962-9343

VL - 13

SP - 531

EP - 540

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

IS - 2

ER -