Abstract
When faced with a problem, policymakers have a choice of action or inaction. Psychological research shows varying results on how individuals evaluate (in)actions conditional on the subsequent outcome. I replicate, generalize, and extend this research into a public management setting with two independent experiments embedded in a nationally representative sample of Danish citizens (n = 2,007). Both experiments show that actions are evaluated more positively than inactions – regardless of the outcome. This finding runs contrary to the inaction (or omission) bias but is consistent with evidence on a “norm of action”, in response to poor performance in political–administrative settings.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Public Management Review |
| Vol/bind | 19 |
| Udgave nummer | 9 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 1352-1364 |
| Antal sider | 13 |
| ISSN | 1471-9037 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 2017 |