Abstract
Introduction: Mental health services have transitioned from treating symptoms to emphasizing personal recovery. Despite its importance, integrating personal recovery into clinical practice remains work in progress. This study evaluates the psychometric qualities of the Brief INSPIRE-O, a five-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing personal recovery. Method: The study collected data from 2018 to 2020 at the Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, using an internet-based system examining 8,192 non-psychotic patients – receiving outpatient treatment. Materials: This study evaluated the Brief INSPIRE-O and used measures of symptomatology (SCL-10), well-being (WHO-5), and social functioning (modified SDS). Results: The study population comprised 76.8% females with a mean age of 32.9 years, and diagnoses included anxiety (28%), depression (34%), and personality disorder (19%). The mean Brief INSPIRE-O score (39.9) was lower than the general population norm (71.1). The Brief INSPIRE-O showed acceptable test–retest reliability (0.75), scalability (0.39), and internal consistency (0.73). Correlations with other mental health criteria were in the expected direction for symptomatology (−0.46), well-being (0.60), and social functioning (−0.43) and remained consistent across diagnoses. Discussion: The Brief INSPIRE-O demonstrated strong psychometric qualities and could be recommended as a measure of personal recovery for use in both research and clinical practice. Its strong theoretical basis and short completion time make it suitable for use for research. Incorporating Brief INSPIRE-O into clinical assessment will further support the process of mental health systems re-orientating towards personal recovery.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Artikelnummer | 1327020 |
| Tidsskrift | Frontiers in Psychiatry |
| Vol/bind | 15 |
| Antal sider | 8 |
| ISSN | 1664-0640 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 2024 |
Bibliografisk note
Funding Information:The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the Capital Region Psychiatry, Denmark.
Funding Information:
We used the ChatGPT-4 model developed by OpenAI to help improve the language of this manuscript. We entered our initial drafts of sections of the text into ChatGPT-4 and used its suggestions to make our writing clearer and more concise. The research team thoroughly reviewed and edited all text generated by ChatGPT-4 to ensure the integrity and authenticity of our work. MS acknowledges the support of the NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Moeller, Larsen, Austin, Slade, Arendt, Andersen and Simonsen.
Citationsformater
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS