Silvicultural regime shapes understory functional structure in European forests

Francesco Chianucci, Francesca Napoleone*, Carlo Ricotta, Carlotta Ferrara, Lina Fusaro, Lorenzo Balducci, Giovanni Trentanovi, Owen Bradley, Bence Kovacs, Marco Mina, Bruno E. L. Cerabolini, Kris Vandekerkhove, Pallieter De Smedt, Luc Lens, Lionel Hertzog, Kris Verheyen, Jeňýk Hofmeister, Jan Hošek, Radim Matula, Inken DoerflerJörg Müller, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Jan Helback, Peter Schall, Markus Fischer, Jacob Heilmann-Clausen, Rasmus Riis-Hansen, Irina Goldberg, Erik Aude, Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas, Inger Kappel Schmidt, Torben Riis Nielsen, Anders Mårell, Yann Dumas, Philippe Janssen, Yoan Paillet, Frederic Archaux, Fotios Xystrakis, Flóra Tinya, Péter Ódor, Réka Aszalós, János Bölöni, Andrea Cutini, Simonetta Bagella, Tommaso Sitzia, Gediminas Brazaitis, Vitas Marozas, Mariana Ujházyová, Karol Ujházy, František Máliš, Björn Nordén, Sabina Burrascano

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

Managing forests to sustain their diversity and functioning is a major challenge in a changing world. Despite the key role of understory vegetation in driving forest biodiversity, regeneration and functioning, few studies address the functional dimensions of understory vegetation response to silvicultural management. We assessed the influence of the silvicultural regimes on the functional diversity and redundancy of European forest understory. We gathered vascular plant abundance data from more than 2000 plots in European forests, each associated with one out of the five most widespread silvicultural regimes. We used generalized linear mixed models to assess the effect of different silvicultural regimes on understory functional diversity (Rao's quadratic entropy) and functional redundancy, while accounting for climate and soil conditions, and explored the reciprocal relationship between three diversity components (functional diversity, redundancy and dominance) across silvicultural regimes through a ternary diversity diagram. Intensive silvicultural regimes are associated with a decrease in functional diversity and an increase in functional redundancy, compared with unmanaged conditions. This means that although intensive management may buffer communities' functions against species or functional losses, it also limits the range of understory response to environmental changes. Policy implications. Different silvicultural regimes influence different facets of understory functional features. While unmanaged forests can be used as a reference to design silvicultural practices in compliance with biodiversity conservation targets, different silvicultural options should be balanced at landscape scale to sustain the multiple forest functions that human societies are increasingly demanding.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Applied Ecology
ISSN0021-8901
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 2024

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Applied Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.

Citationsformater