Systematic position of the Clicking Frog (Kassinula Laurent, 1940), the problem of chimeric sequences and the revised classification of the family Hyperoliidae

Tadeáš Nečas*, Jos Kielgast, Zoltán T. Nagy, Zacharie Kusamba Chifundera, Václav Gvoždík

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

5 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

The systematics of the African frog family Hyperoliidae has undergone turbulent changes in last decades. Representatives of several genera have not been genetically investigated or with only limited data, and their phylogenetic positions are thus still not reliably known. This is the case of the De Witte's Clicking Frog (Kassinula wittei) which belongs to a monotypic genus. This miniature frog occurs in a poorly studied region, southeastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, northern Zambia, Angola. So far it is not settled whether this genus belongs to the subfamily Kassininae as a relative of the genus Kassina, or to the subfamily Hyperoliinae as a relative of the genus Afrixalus. Here we present for the first time a multilocus phylogenetic reconstruction (using five nuclear and one mitochondrial marker) of the family Hyperoliidae, including Kassinula. We demonstrate with high confidence that Kassinula is a member of Hyperoliinae belonging to a clade also containing Afrixalus (sub-Saharan Africa), Heterixalus (Madagascar) and Tachycnemis (Seychelles). We find that Kassinula represents a divergent lineage (17–25 Mya), which supports its separate genus-level status, but its exact systematic position remains uncertain. We propose to name the clade to which the above four genera belong as the tribe Tachycnemini Channing, 1989. A new taxonomy of the family Hyperoliidae was recently proposed by Dubois et al. (2021: Megataxa 5, 1–738). We demonstrate here that the new taxonomy was based on a partially erroneous phylogenetic reconstruction resulting from a supermatrix analysis of chimeric DNA sequences combining data from two families, Hyperoliidae and Arthroleptidae (the case of Cryptothylax). We therefore correct the erroneous part and propose a new, revised suprageneric taxonomy of the family Hyperoliidae. We also emphasize the importance of inspecting individual genetic markers before their concatenation or coalescent-based tree reconstructions to avoid analyses of chimeric DNA sequences producing incorrect phylogenetic reconstructions. Especially when phylogenetic reconstructions are used to propose taxonomies and systematic classifications.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer107514
TidsskriftMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Vol/bind174
Antal sider11
ISSN1055-7903
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
We would like to express our gratitude to the Congolese Wildlife Authority represented by the Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN) for granting us permission to work in Upemba and Kundelungu National Parks, as well as the chief wardens of both national parks. We thank Erik Verheyen and Olivier S. G. Pauwels for providing access to the RBINS collections. We also thank the Belgian Focal Point to the Global Taxonomy Initiative for funding the field work. This study was funded by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic (DKRVO 2019–2023/6.VII.d, National Museum, 00023272), institutional support of the Institute of Vertebrate Biology of the Czech Academy of Sciences (RVO: 68081766), and the Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University (MUNI/A/1401/2021).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.

Citationsformater