The development of a new cardiac auscultation test: How do screening and diagnostic skills differ?

Tommy Nielsen, Henning Mølgaard, Charlotte Ringsted, Berit Eika, Tommy Nielsen, Henning Mølgaard, Charlotte Vibeke Ringsted, Berit Eika

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    8 Citationer (Scopus)

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: Newly qualified doctors are expected to be able to conduct a cardiac auscultation unassisted, but studies show conflicting results regarding cardiac auscultation skills. METHODS: A two-part test instrument was designed containing innovative recordings of heart sounds from patients with common cardiac murmurs as well as healthy controls. A total number of 109 participants were tested, representing four levels of clinical experience. The content validity of the test instrument was studied by a postal questionnaire to 114 clinical teachers at the University Hospital of Aarhus, Denmark. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between level of experience and the ability to diagnose the conditions from which the murmurs originated (r = 0.45, P < 0.0001). No correlation was found between level of experience and the ability to identify persons with cardiac murmurs from healthy controls. All groups showed a tendency to interpret healthy heart sounds as cardiac murmurs. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic ability was found to correlate positively with clinical experience, whereas the ability to distinguish cardiac murmurs from normal heart sounds seems independent of clinical experience.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftMedical Teacher
    Vol/bind32
    Udgave nummer1
    Sider (fra-til)56-61
    Antal sider6
    ISSN0142-159X
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 1 jan. 2010

    Citationsformater