The impact of a csDMARD in combination with a TNF inhibitor on drug retention and clinical remission in axial spondyloarthritis

Michael Nissen, Bénédicte Delcoigne, Daniela Di Giuseppe, Lennart Jacobsson, Merete Lund Hetland, Adrian Ciurea, Lucie Nekvindova, Florenzo Iannone, Nurullah Akkoc, Tuulikki Sokka-Isler, Karen Minde Fagerli, Maria Jose Santos, Catalin Codreanu, Manuel Pombo-Suarez, Ziga Rotar, Bjorn Gudbjornsson, Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma, Anne Gitte Loft, Burkhard Möller, Herman MannFabrizio Conti, Gozde Yildirim Cetin, Heikki Relas, Brigitte Michelsen, Pedro Avila Ribeiro, Ruxandra Ionescu, Carlos Sanchez-Piedra, Matija Tomsic, Árni Jón Geirsson, Johan Askling, Bente Glintborg, Ulf Lindström

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

7 Citationer (Scopus)
12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Many axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) patients receive a conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) in combination with a TNF inhibitor (TNFi). However, the value of this co-therapy remains unclear. The objectives were to describe the characteristics of axSpA patients initiating a first TNFi as monotherapy compared with co-therapy with csDMARD, to compare one-year TNFi retention and remission rates, and to explore the impact of peripheral arthritis. METHODS: Data was collected from 13 European registries. One-year outcomes included TNFi retention and hazard ratios (HR) for discontinuation with 95% CIs. Logistic regression was performed with adjusted odds ratios (OR) of achieving remission (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-CRP < 1.3 and/or BASDAI < 2) and stratified by treatment. Inter-registry heterogeneity was assessed using random-effect meta-analyses, combined results were presented when heterogeneity was not significant. Peripheral arthritis was defined as ≥1 swollen joint at baseline (=TNFi start). RESULTS: Amongst 24 171 axSpA patients, 32% received csDMARD co-therapy (range across countries: 13.5% to 71.2%). The co-therapy group had more baseline peripheral arthritis and higher CRP than the monotherapy group. One-year TNFi-retention rates (95% CI): 79% (78, 79%) for TNFi monotherapy vs 82% (81, 83%) with co-therapy (P < 0.001). Remission was obtained in 20% on monotherapy and 22% on co-therapy (P < 0.001); adjusted OR of 1.16 (1.07, 1.25). Remission rates at 12 months were similar in patients with/without peripheral arthritis. CONCLUSION: This large European study of axial SpA patients showed similar one-year treatment outcomes for TNFi monotherapy and csDMARD co-therapy, although considerable heterogeneity across countries limited the identification of certain subgroups (e.g. peripheral arthritis) that may benefit from co-therapy.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftRheumatology
Vol/bind61
Udgave nummer12
Sider (fra-til)4741-4751
Antal sider11
ISSN1462-0324
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected].

Citationsformater