TY - JOUR
T1 - The Relation Between Precarious Employment Arrangements and Social Precarity
T2 - Findings from the PREMIS Study in Stockholm, Sweden
AU - Matilla-Santander, Nuria
AU - Jonsson, Johanna
AU - Kreshpaj, Bertina
AU - Orellana, Cecilia
AU - Benach, Joan
AU - Badarin, Kathryn
AU - Burström, Bo
AU - Vives, Alejandra
AU - Kjellberg, Katarina
AU - Strömdahl, Susanne
AU - Johansson, Gun
AU - Östergren, Per-Olof
AU - Bodin, Theo
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Precarious employment (PE) is a well-known social determinant of health and health inequalities. However, as most previous studies have focused on physical and mental well-being, less is known about the social-related outcomes (ie, social precarity) associated with precarious arrangements. This cross-sectional study aims to investigate whether PE is associated with social precarity in a working population of 401 nonstandard employed workers in Stockholm, Sweden (2016-2017). PE was assessed with the Swedish version of the Employment Precarious Scale (EPRES-Se) and analyzed in relation to social precarity related to working life (eg, task quality and job security) and living conditions (eg, restraint in social activities and financial constraints). We found positive adjusted associations between quartiles of EPRES-Se and social precarity related to working life (eg, being locked in an occupation [aPRq4:1.33 [1.10-1.61]]) and living conditions (eg, inability to participate in social activities because of work [aPRq4:1.27 [1.10-1.46]]). Our findings suggest that individuals in PE experience social precarity, stressing that PE may have negative effects on well-being. Further studies using multidimensional constructs of PE and larger samples should analyze these findings according to social and policy contexts in order to be able to inform policymakers.
AB - Precarious employment (PE) is a well-known social determinant of health and health inequalities. However, as most previous studies have focused on physical and mental well-being, less is known about the social-related outcomes (ie, social precarity) associated with precarious arrangements. This cross-sectional study aims to investigate whether PE is associated with social precarity in a working population of 401 nonstandard employed workers in Stockholm, Sweden (2016-2017). PE was assessed with the Swedish version of the Employment Precarious Scale (EPRES-Se) and analyzed in relation to social precarity related to working life (eg, task quality and job security) and living conditions (eg, restraint in social activities and financial constraints). We found positive adjusted associations between quartiles of EPRES-Se and social precarity related to working life (eg, being locked in an occupation [aPRq4:1.33 [1.10-1.61]]) and living conditions (eg, inability to participate in social activities because of work [aPRq4:1.27 [1.10-1.46]]). Our findings suggest that individuals in PE experience social precarity, stressing that PE may have negative effects on well-being. Further studies using multidimensional constructs of PE and larger samples should analyze these findings according to social and policy contexts in order to be able to inform policymakers.
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Employment
KW - Humans
KW - Mental Health
KW - Occupations
KW - Sweden
U2 - 10.1177/00207314211051880
DO - 10.1177/00207314211051880
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34817272
VL - 52
SP - 201
EP - 211
JO - International Journal of Health Services
JF - International Journal of Health Services
SN - 0020-7314
IS - 2
ER -