TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward a New Multi-Dimensional Classification of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research for Traumatic Brain Injury Study
AU - Gravesteijn, Benjamin Y.
AU - Sewalt, Charlie A.
AU - Ercole, Ari
AU - Akerlund, Cecilia
AU - Nelson, David
AU - Maas, Andrew I.r.
AU - Menon, David
AU - Lingsma, Hester F.
AU - Steyerberg, Ewout W.
AU - Amrein, Krisztina
AU - Andelic, Nada
AU - Andreassen, Lasse
AU - Anke, Audny
AU - Antoni, Anna
AU - Audiber, Gérard
AU - Azouvi, Philippe
AU - Azzolini, Maria Luisa
AU - Bartel, Ronald
AU - Barzó, Pál
AU - Beauvais, Romuald
AU - Beer, Ronny
AU - Bellander, Bo-michael
AU - Belli, Antonio
AU - Benali, Habib
AU - Berardino, Maurizio
AU - Beretta, Luigi
AU - Blaabjerg, Morten
AU - Bragge, Peter
AU - Brazinova, Alexandra
AU - Brinck, Vibeke
AU - Brooker, Joanne
AU - Brorsson, Camilla
AU - Buki, Andras
AU - Bullinger, Monika
AU - Cabeleira, Manuel
AU - Caccioppola, Alessio
AU - Calappi, Emiliana
AU - Calvi, Maria Rosa
AU - Cameron, Peter
AU - Lozano, Guillermo Carbayo
AU - Carbonara, Marco
AU - Chevallard, Giorgio
AU - Chieregato, Arturo
AU - Citerio, Giuseppe
AU - Cnossen, Maryse
AU - Coburn, Mark
AU - Coles, Jonathan
AU - Cooper, D. Jamie
AU - Correia, Marta
AU - Kondziella, Daniel
AU - the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research for Traumatic Brain Injury Collaborators
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is currently classified as mild, moderate, or severe TBI by trichotomizing the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). We aimed to explore directions for a more refined multidimensional classification system. For that purpose, we performed a hypothesis-free cluster analysis in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research for TBI (CENTER-TBI) database: a European all-severity TBI cohort (n = 4509). The first building block consisted of key imaging characteristics, summarized using principal component analysis from 12 imaging characteristics. The other building blocks were demographics, clinical severity, secondary insults, and cause of injury. With these building blocks, the patients were clustered into four groups. We applied bootstrap resampling with replacement to study the stability of cluster allocation. The characteristics that predominantly defined the clusters were injury cause, major extracranial injury, and GCS. The clusters consisted of 1451, 1534, 1006, and 518 patients, respectively. The clustering method was quite stable: the proportion of patients staying in one cluster after resampling and reclustering was 97.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.6–99.9%). These clusters characterized groups of patients with different functional outcomes: from mild to severe, 12%, 19%, 36%, and 58% of patients had unfavorable 6 month outcome. Compared with the mild and the upper intermediate cluster, the lower intermediate and the severe cluster received more key interventions. To conclude, four types of TBI patients may be defined by injury mechanism, presence of major extracranial injury and GCS. Describing patients according to these three characteristics could potentially capture differences in etiology and care pathways better than with GCS only.
AB - Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is currently classified as mild, moderate, or severe TBI by trichotomizing the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). We aimed to explore directions for a more refined multidimensional classification system. For that purpose, we performed a hypothesis-free cluster analysis in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research for TBI (CENTER-TBI) database: a European all-severity TBI cohort (n = 4509). The first building block consisted of key imaging characteristics, summarized using principal component analysis from 12 imaging characteristics. The other building blocks were demographics, clinical severity, secondary insults, and cause of injury. With these building blocks, the patients were clustered into four groups. We applied bootstrap resampling with replacement to study the stability of cluster allocation. The characteristics that predominantly defined the clusters were injury cause, major extracranial injury, and GCS. The clusters consisted of 1451, 1534, 1006, and 518 patients, respectively. The clustering method was quite stable: the proportion of patients staying in one cluster after resampling and reclustering was 97.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.6–99.9%). These clusters characterized groups of patients with different functional outcomes: from mild to severe, 12%, 19%, 36%, and 58% of patients had unfavorable 6 month outcome. Compared with the mild and the upper intermediate cluster, the lower intermediate and the severe cluster received more key interventions. To conclude, four types of TBI patients may be defined by injury mechanism, presence of major extracranial injury and GCS. Describing patients according to these three characteristics could potentially capture differences in etiology and care pathways better than with GCS only.
U2 - 10.1089/neu.2019.6764
DO - 10.1089/neu.2019.6764
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31672086
SN - 0897-7151
VL - 37
SP - 1002
EP - 1010
JO - Journal of Neurotrauma
JF - Journal of Neurotrauma
IS - 7
ER -