Unfolding principles for student peer feedback: A comparative analysis across higher education contexts

Marianne Ellegaard; Martin Niss; Jesper Bruun; Joni Lämsä; Frederik Voetmann  Christiansen; Gry Green Linell; Rimma Nyman; Bjørn Friis Johannsen

doi:10.23865/hu.v12.2680

Unfolding principles for student peer feedback: A comparative analysis across higher education contexts

Bidragets oversatte titel: Peerfeedbackprincipper: En sammenlignende analyse på tværs af højere uddannelses-kontekster

Marianne Ellegaard^*, Martin Niss, Jesper Bruun, Joni Lämsä, Frederik Voetmann Christiansen, Gry Green Linell, Rimma Nyman, Bjørn Friis Johannsen

^*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

55 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

I denne artikel konceptualiserer vi formative principper for peerfeedback ved at analysere og sammenligne seks empiriske eksempler på formative peerfeedback i en række internationale STEM (videnskab, teknologi, ingeniør- og matematik) kontekster. Ved at diskutere, hvordan disse forskellige tilgange til peerfeedback udfolder sig i praksis, ønsker vi at fremme brobygningen mellem teori og praksis i implementeringen af peerfeedback i højere uddannelser. Som en gruppe af forskere og undervisere fra seks højere uddannelsesinstitutioner analyserede, diskuterede og syntetiserede vi praktiske eksempler på peerfeedback i STEM, der dækker et bredt spektrum af kontekster, formål og former. Analysen og sammenligningen af disse eksempler illustrerer, hvordan principperne i peerfeedback opstår i praksis. Vi diskuterer, hvordan peerfeedback-konteksten påvirker den praktiske implementering, især med hensyn til formål og mål, udviklingen og brugen af vurderingskriterier, og embedding og støtte af initiativerne ind i undervisningen og læringen.

Bidragets oversatte titel	Peerfeedbackprincipper: En sammenlignende analyse på tværs af højere uddannelses-kontekster
Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Högre Utbilding
Vol/bind	12
Udgave nummer	2
Sider (fra-til)	53-77
Antal sider	25
ISSN	2000-7558
DOI	https://doi.org/10.23865/hu.v12.2680
Status	Udgivet - 2022

Emneord

Det Natur- og Biovidenskabelige Fakultet
peerfeedback
sammenlignende
universitetsundervisning

Adgang til dokumentet

10.23865/hu.v12.2680Licens: CC BY-NC

FulltextForlagets udgivne version, 299 KBLicens: CC BY-NC

Citationsformater

@article{9e23c369ea1d45049ac27be8af454e98,

title = "Unfolding principles for student peer feedback: A comparative analysis across higher education contexts",

abstract = "In this paper we conceptualize formative peer feedback principles by analyzing and comparing six empirical examples of formative peer feedback in a set of international STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) contexts. By discussing how these different approaches to peer feedback unfold in practice, we aim to facilitate the bridging of the gap between theory and practice in implementing peer feedback in Higher Education. As a group of researchers and teaching practitioners from six Higher Education institutions, we discussed, analyzed, and synthesized practical examples of peer feedback in STEM that cover a breadth of settings, aims, and forms. The analysis and comparison of these examples illustrate howprinciples in peer feedback emerge in practice. We discuss how the context in peer feedback influences its practical implementation, particularly with regard to its purpose and aims, the development and use of assessment criteria, and embedding and supporting the initiatives into the teaching and learning activities.",

keywords = "Faculty of Science, peerfeedback, sammenlignende, universitetsundervisning",

author = "Marianne Ellegaard and Martin Niss and Jesper Bruun and Joni L{\"a}ms{\"a} and Christiansen, {Frederik Voetmann} and {Green Linell}, Gry and Rimma Nyman and Johannsen, {Bj{\o}rn Friis}",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.23865/hu.v12.2680",

language = "English",

volume = "12",

pages = "53--77",

journal = "H{\"o}gre Utbilding",

issn = "2000-7558",

publisher = "Cappelen Damm Akademisk",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unfolding principles for student peer feedback

T2 - A comparative analysis across higher education contexts

AU - Ellegaard, Marianne

AU - Niss, Martin

AU - Bruun, Jesper

AU - Lämsä, Joni

AU - Christiansen, Frederik Voetmann

AU - Green Linell, Gry

AU - Nyman, Rimma

AU - Johannsen, Bjørn Friis

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - In this paper we conceptualize formative peer feedback principles by analyzing and comparing six empirical examples of formative peer feedback in a set of international STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) contexts. By discussing how these different approaches to peer feedback unfold in practice, we aim to facilitate the bridging of the gap between theory and practice in implementing peer feedback in Higher Education. As a group of researchers and teaching practitioners from six Higher Education institutions, we discussed, analyzed, and synthesized practical examples of peer feedback in STEM that cover a breadth of settings, aims, and forms. The analysis and comparison of these examples illustrate howprinciples in peer feedback emerge in practice. We discuss how the context in peer feedback influences its practical implementation, particularly with regard to its purpose and aims, the development and use of assessment criteria, and embedding and supporting the initiatives into the teaching and learning activities.

AB - In this paper we conceptualize formative peer feedback principles by analyzing and comparing six empirical examples of formative peer feedback in a set of international STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) contexts. By discussing how these different approaches to peer feedback unfold in practice, we aim to facilitate the bridging of the gap between theory and practice in implementing peer feedback in Higher Education. As a group of researchers and teaching practitioners from six Higher Education institutions, we discussed, analyzed, and synthesized practical examples of peer feedback in STEM that cover a breadth of settings, aims, and forms. The analysis and comparison of these examples illustrate howprinciples in peer feedback emerge in practice. We discuss how the context in peer feedback influences its practical implementation, particularly with regard to its purpose and aims, the development and use of assessment criteria, and embedding and supporting the initiatives into the teaching and learning activities.

KW - Faculty of Science

KW - peerfeedback

KW - sammenlignende

KW - universitetsundervisning

U2 - 10.23865/hu.v12.2680

DO - 10.23865/hu.v12.2680

M3 - Journal article

SN - 2000-7558

VL - 12

SP - 53

EP - 77

JO - Högre Utbilding

JF - Högre Utbilding

IS - 2

ER -