TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of an accelerometer system for activity monitoring in children with functional disabilities
AU - Stage, Anna
AU - Fromberg, Emil Buch
AU - Elsborg, Peter
AU - Kristensen, Mette Røn
AU - Mikkelsen, Silje
AU - Bølling, Mads
AU - Aadahl, Mette
AU - Stahlhut, Michelle
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - To assess the validity of the SENS motion® system (SENS) for measuring postures and movements in school-aged children with functional disabilities, using direct video observation as the criterion method. In this cross-sectional-study, 29 children (51.7% male, mean age 10.8 ± 2.9 years) from two special schools in Denmark participated. Each child wore a SENS device on the thigh while completing a standardized protocol of six categories: lying/sitting, standing, walking, running, cycling, and step count. All activities were video recorded. Video data were coded in 5-s epochs and aligned with SENS output. Agreement was assessed by comparing the observed time spent in each activity with the corresponding time estimated by SENS, expressed as mean values, standard deviations, mean differences, and percentage agreement. SENS showed excellent agreement for walking (93.2%) and lying/sitting (96.2%), good agreement for running (89.2%), and moderate agreement for standing (74.1%). Cycling was poorly detected, with only 6.4% agreement, as it was frequently misclassified as walking (50.8%) or lying/sitting (42.7%). Step counts were slightly overestimated by SENS (mean difference 7.2 steps). Overall, SENS tended to underestimate activity duration compared with the observation. Conclusion: SENS demonstrated excellent to good validity for detecting lying/sitting, walking, and acceptable validity for running in children with functional disabilities, but moderate validity for standing and limited validity for cycling. These findings indicate that SENS may be useful for monitoring several common postures and activities in this population, though further algorithm refinement and broader validation are needed, particularly for cycling and postural transitions. (Table presented.).
AB - To assess the validity of the SENS motion® system (SENS) for measuring postures and movements in school-aged children with functional disabilities, using direct video observation as the criterion method. In this cross-sectional-study, 29 children (51.7% male, mean age 10.8 ± 2.9 years) from two special schools in Denmark participated. Each child wore a SENS device on the thigh while completing a standardized protocol of six categories: lying/sitting, standing, walking, running, cycling, and step count. All activities were video recorded. Video data were coded in 5-s epochs and aligned with SENS output. Agreement was assessed by comparing the observed time spent in each activity with the corresponding time estimated by SENS, expressed as mean values, standard deviations, mean differences, and percentage agreement. SENS showed excellent agreement for walking (93.2%) and lying/sitting (96.2%), good agreement for running (89.2%), and moderate agreement for standing (74.1%). Cycling was poorly detected, with only 6.4% agreement, as it was frequently misclassified as walking (50.8%) or lying/sitting (42.7%). Step counts were slightly overestimated by SENS (mean difference 7.2 steps). Overall, SENS tended to underestimate activity duration compared with the observation. Conclusion: SENS demonstrated excellent to good validity for detecting lying/sitting, walking, and acceptable validity for running in children with functional disabilities, but moderate validity for standing and limited validity for cycling. These findings indicate that SENS may be useful for monitoring several common postures and activities in this population, though further algorithm refinement and broader validation are needed, particularly for cycling and postural transitions. (Table presented.).
KW - Accelerometry
KW - Children
KW - Functional disabilities
KW - Physical activity
KW - Sedentary behavior
KW - Validation
U2 - 10.1007/s00431-025-06679-4
DO - 10.1007/s00431-025-06679-4
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41537899
AN - SCOPUS:105027601388
SN - 0340-6199
VL - 185
JO - European Journal of Pediatrics
JF - European Journal of Pediatrics
IS - 2
M1 - 78
ER -