TY - JOUR
T1 - Visual (data) observation in International Relations
T2 - Attentiveness, close description, and the politics of seeing differently
AU - Austin, Jonathan Luke
AU - Bramsen, Isabel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British International Studies Association.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Has Visual International Relations (IR) become too distant from the content of visual artefacts? This is a paradoxical question. Visual IR is a vibrant and pluralist field exploring visuals in innumerable ways. Nonetheless, the field tends to focus on 'deep' readings of the socio-political implications of visual artefacts at the expense of a close and attentive observation and description of the events, situations, or phenomena they may depict. Simply put, visual IR usually analyses visuals-as-visuals rather than seeing them as entry points for studying the social world. But might a video of torture teach us something about the practicality of torture? Might a video of peace negotiations teach us something about their successes or failures? Can we gain a fleeting glimpse of 'reality' within visuals? We address these questions by first situating our focus on close 'visual (data) observation' in conceptual conversation with the literature's existing focus on deep interpretation. Second, we outline three approaches to visual observation as they are deployed outside IR. Third, we unpack how those approaches might be of value for IR, especially vis-à-vis the study of practice, materiality, and discourse. Finally, we conclude by asking if visual data observation can retain critical political potentiality.
AB - Has Visual International Relations (IR) become too distant from the content of visual artefacts? This is a paradoxical question. Visual IR is a vibrant and pluralist field exploring visuals in innumerable ways. Nonetheless, the field tends to focus on 'deep' readings of the socio-political implications of visual artefacts at the expense of a close and attentive observation and description of the events, situations, or phenomena they may depict. Simply put, visual IR usually analyses visuals-as-visuals rather than seeing them as entry points for studying the social world. But might a video of torture teach us something about the practicality of torture? Might a video of peace negotiations teach us something about their successes or failures? Can we gain a fleeting glimpse of 'reality' within visuals? We address these questions by first situating our focus on close 'visual (data) observation' in conceptual conversation with the literature's existing focus on deep interpretation. Second, we outline three approaches to visual observation as they are deployed outside IR. Third, we unpack how those approaches might be of value for IR, especially vis-à-vis the study of practice, materiality, and discourse. Finally, we conclude by asking if visual data observation can retain critical political potentiality.
KW - critique
KW - description
KW - methodology
KW - micro-sociology
KW - observation
KW - Visual International Relations
U2 - 10.1017/S0260210523000426
DO - 10.1017/S0260210523000426
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85174399976
SN - 0260-2105
VL - 50
SP - 965
EP - 986
JO - Review of International Studies
JF - Review of International Studies
IS - 6
ER -