A framework for sex, gender, and diversity analysis in research:  Funding agencies have ample room to improve their policies

Lilian Hunt; Mathias Wullum Nielsen; Londa Schiebinger

doi:10.1126/science.abp9775

A framework for sex, gender, and diversity analysis in research: Funding agencies have ample room to improve their policies

Lilian Hunt, Mathias Wullum Nielsen, Londa Schiebinger^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Sociology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

30 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Journal	Science
Volume	377
Issue number	6614
Pages (from-to)	1492-1495
Number of pages	4
ISSN	0036-8075
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp9775
Publication status	Published - 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
There are three pillars of the science infrastructure that need to coordinate policies to achieve excellence in science (2). The first, funding agencies, encourage integrating SG&DA at the beginning of the research process. In 2003, the European Commission (EC) endorsed “questioning systematically whether, and in what sense, sex and gender are relevant in the objectives and methodology of projects.” Other public-funding agencies followed suit with policies implemented at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; 2010), German Research Foundation (DFG; 2020), and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF; 2021), among others (6).

Access to Document

10.1126/science.abp9775

FulltextAccepted author manuscript, 1.79 MB

Cite this

@article{2f6143d064514345b8864c69467422cb,

title = "A framework for sex, gender, and diversity analysis in research: Funding agencies have ample room to improve their policies",

author = "Lilian Hunt and Nielsen, {Mathias Wullum} and Londa Schiebinger",

note = "Funding Information: There are three pillars of the science infrastructure that need to coordinate policies to achieve excellence in science (2). The first, funding agencies, encourage integrating SG&DA at the beginning of the research process. In 2003, the European Commission (EC) endorsed “questioning systematically whether, and in what sense, sex and gender are relevant in the objectives and methodology of projects.” Other public-funding agencies followed suit with policies implemented at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; 2010), German Research Foundation (DFG; 2020), and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF; 2021), among others (6).",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1126/science.abp9775",

language = "English",

volume = "377",

pages = "1492--1495",

journal = "Science",

issn = "0036-8075",

publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",

number = "6614",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A framework for sex, gender, and diversity analysis in research

T2 - Funding agencies have ample room to improve their policies

AU - Hunt, Lilian

AU - Nielsen, Mathias Wullum

AU - Schiebinger, Londa

N1 - Funding Information: There are three pillars of the science infrastructure that need to coordinate policies to achieve excellence in science (2). The first, funding agencies, encourage integrating SG&DA at the beginning of the research process. In 2003, the European Commission (EC) endorsed “questioning systematically whether, and in what sense, sex and gender are relevant in the objectives and methodology of projects.” Other public-funding agencies followed suit with policies implemented at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; 2010), German Research Foundation (DFG; 2020), and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF; 2021), among others (6).

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

U2 - 10.1126/science.abp9775

DO - 10.1126/science.abp9775

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36173857

AN - SCOPUS:85138879091

VL - 377

SP - 1492

EP - 1495

JO - Science

JF - Science

SN - 0036-8075

IS - 6614

ER -