A novel Borrelia-specific real-time PCR assay is not suitable for diagnosing Lyme neuroborreliosis

Regitze Renee Pedersen, Kasper Nørskov Kragh, Blaine Gabriel Fritz, Mathilde Ørbæk, Peter Østrup Jensen, Anne Mette Lebech, Thomas Bjarnsholt*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) is complicated by a lack of adequate test systems and by the complex culturing conditions required to grow the causative pathogens in the Borrelia sensu lato complex. Improved testing methods are urgently needed. Here, we evaluate the applicability of a novel commercially available Borrelia-specific real-time PCR assay to diagnose LNB. Materials and methods: The specificity and sensitivity of the novel alphaCube Borrelia real-time PCR assay (Mikrogen) and the well-tested Micro-Dx™ real-time PCR assay (Molzym) were evaluated in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) spiked with known amounts of Borrelia garinii and CSF from 19 patients with definite or possible LNB. CSF from patients diagnosed with neurosyphilis or enterovirus meningitis served as controls. Results: The alphaCube assay specifically identified Borrelia down to 93 B garinii cells/mL in spiked CSF samples. The Micro-Dx™ real-time PCR assay was able to identify the presence of bacteria down to 9300 cells/mL in spiked samples. In CSF from patients diagnosed with LNB the sensitivity of the alphaCube assay was 0.00 and 0.00 for the Micro-DX. Conclusion: Although the alphaCube Borrelia assay was able to identify down to 93 cells/mL in spiked CSF samples, the inability to identify Borrelia in CSF samples from patients with LNB suggests that this type of infection carries a bacterial load in CSF below this detection level. Based on these results, neither the alphaCube Borrelia real-time PCR assay nor the Micro-Dx™ real-time PCR assay can be recommended for routine diagnostics of LNB using CSF samples.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101971
JournalTicks and Tick-borne Diseases
Volume13
Issue number5
ISSN1877-959X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022

Cite this