A survey of preferences for respiratory support in the intensive care unit for patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure

Tayyba N. Aslam*, Thomas L. Klitgaard, Christian A.O. Ahlstedt, Finn H. Andersen, Michelle S. Chew, Marie O. Collet, Maria Cronhjort, Stine Estrup, Ole K. Fossum, Shirin K. Frisvold, Hans Joerg Gillmann, Anders Granholm, Trine M. Gundem, Kristin Hauss, Jacob Hollenberg, Maria E. Huanca Condori, Johanna Hästbacka, Bror A. Johnstad, Eric Keus, Maj Brit N. KjærPål Klepstad, Mette Krag, Reidar Kvåle, Manu L.N.G. Malbrain, Christian S. Meyhoff, Matt Morgan, Anders Møller, Carmen A. Pfortmueller, Lone M. Poulsen, Andrew C. Robertson, Joerg C. Schefold, Olav L. Schjørring, Martin Siegemund, Martin I. Sigurdsson, Fredrik Sjövall, Kristian Strand, Thomas Stueber, Wojciech Szczeklik, Rebecka R. Wahlin, Helge L. Wangberg, Karl Andre Wian, Sine Wichmann, Kristin Hofsø, Morten H. Møller, Anders Perner, Bodil S. Rasmussen, Jon H. Laake

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: When caring for mechanically ventilated adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF), clinicians are faced with an uncertain choice between ventilator modes allowing for spontaneous breaths or ventilation fully controlled by the ventilator. The preferences of clinicians managing such patients, and what motivates their choice of ventilator mode, are largely unknown. To better understand how clinicians' preferences may impact the choice of ventilatory support for patients with AHRF, we issued a survey to an international network of intensive care unit (ICU) researchers. Methods: We distributed an online survey with 32 broadly similar and interlinked questions on how clinicians prioritise spontaneous or controlled ventilation in invasively ventilated patients with AHRF of different severity, and which factors determine their choice. Results: The survey was distributed to 1337 recipients in 12 countries. Of these, 415 (31%) completed the survey either fully (52%) or partially (48%). Most respondents were identified as medical specialists (87%) or physicians in training (11%). Modes allowing for spontaneous ventilation were considered preferable in mild AHRF, with controlled ventilation considered as progressively more important in moderate and severe AHRF. Among respondents there was strong support (90%) for a randomised clinical trial comparing spontaneous with controlled ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF. Conclusions: The responses from this international survey suggest that there is clinical equipoise for the preferred ventilator mode in patients with AHRF of moderate severity. We found strong support for a randomised trial comparing modes of ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume67
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)1383-1394
Number of pages12
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Department of Research and Development, Division of Critical Care and Emergencies, Oslo University Hospital and by South‐Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, project number 2021061. Funders had no role in the design or conduct of this study.

Funding Information:
Anders Granholm, Maj‐Brit N. Kjær, Morten H. Møller and Anders Perner are affiliated with the Department of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, which receives support for research from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Sygeforsikringen ‘danmark’, Beckett's Foundation and Pfizer and does contract research for AM‐Pharma. Anders Perner has received an honorarium from Novartis for participation in an advisory board. Bodil S. Rasmussen, Olav L. Schjørring and Thomas L. Klitgaard are affiliated with the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, which receives support from the Novo Nordisk Foundation and the Ministry of Higher Education and Science. Sine Wichmann is affiliated with the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Nordsjællands Hospital, Denmark, which has received research funding from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Sygeforsikringen ‘danmark’, Svend Andersens' Foundation and Ehrenreich Foundation. Christian S. Meyhoff has co‐founded a start‐up company, WARD24/7 ApS, with the aim of pursuing the regulatory and commercial activities of the WARD‐project (Wireless Assessment of Respiratory and circulatory Distress, a project developing a clinical support system for continuous wireless monitoring of vital signs). WARD24/7 ApS has obtained licence agreement for any WARD‐project software and patents. One patent has been filed: ‘Wireless Assessment of Respiratory and circulatory Distress (WARD), EP 21184712.4 and EP 21205557.8’. These interests are unrelated to the current publication. Manu L. N. G. Malbrain is a professor of Critical Care Research at the First Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland. He is co‐founder, past‐president and current treasurer of WSACS (The Abdominal Compartment Society, http://www.wsacs.org ). He is a member of the medical advisory Board of Pulsion Medical Systems (now fully part of Getinge group), Serenno Medical, Potrero Medical, Sentinel Medical and Baxter. He consults for BBraun, Becton Dickinson, ConvaTec, Spiegelberg, Medtronic, MedCaptain, and Holtech Medical, and received speaker's fees from PeerVoice. He holds stock options for Serenno and Potrero. He is co‐founder and president of the International Fluid Academy (IFA). The IFA ( http://www.fluidacademy.org ) is integrated within the not‐for‐profit charitable organisation iMERiT, International Medical Education and Research Initiative, under Belgian law. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.

Keywords

  • acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure
  • acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • controlled ventilation
  • invasive mechanical ventilation
  • spontaneous ventilation
  • survey

Cite this