A systematic analysis of regression models for protein engineering

Richard Michael, Jacob Kæstel-Hansen, Peter Mørch Groth, Simon Bartels, Jesper Salomon, Pengfei Tian, Nikos S. Hatzakis, Wouter Boomsma*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To optimize proteins for particular traits holds great promise for industrial and pharmaceutical purposes. Machine Learning is increasingly applied in this field to predict properties of proteins, thereby guiding the experimental optimization process. A natural question is: How much progress are we making with such predictions, and how important is the choice of regressor and representation? In this paper, we demonstrate that different assessment criteria for regressor performance can lead to dramatically different conclusions, depending on the choice of metric, and how one defines generalization. We highlight the fundamental issues of sample bias in typical regression scenarios and how this can lead to misleading conclusions about regressor performance. Finally, we make the case for the importance of calibrated uncertainty in this domain.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1012061
JournalPLOS Computational Biology
Volume20
Issue number5 May
Number of pages22
ISSN1553-734X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Michael et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Cite this