Accuracy and Precision of a Plane Wave Vector Flow Imaging Method in the Healthy Carotid Artery

Jonas Jensen, Carlos Armando Villagómez Hoyos, Marie Sand Traberg, Jacob Bjerring Olesen, Borislav Gueorguiev Tomov, Ramin Moshavegh, Simon Holbek, Matthias Bo Stuart, Caroline Ewertsen, Kristoffer Lindskov Hansen, Carsten Thomsen, Michael Bachmann Nielsen, Jørgen Arendt Jensen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of the study described here was to investigate the accuracy and precision of a plane wave 2-D vector flow imaging (VFI) method in laminar and complex blood flow conditions in the healthy carotid artery. The approach was to study (i) the accuracy for complex flow by comparing the velocity field from a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation to VFI estimates obtained from the scan of an anthropomorphic flow phantom and from an in vivo scan; (ii) the accuracy for laminar unidirectional flow in vivo by comparing peak systolic velocities from VFI with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA); (iii) the precision of VFI estimation in vivo at several evaluation points in the vessels. The carotid artery at the bifurcation was scanned using both fast plane wave ultrasound and MRA in 10 healthy volunteers. The MRA geometry acquired from one of the volunteers was used to fabricate an anthropomorphic flow phantom, which was also scanned using the fast plane wave sequence. The same geometry was used in a CFD simulation to calculate the velocity field. Results indicated that similar flow patterns and vortices were estimated with CFD and VFI in the phantom for the carotid bifurcation. The root-mean-square difference between CFD and VFI was within 0.12 m/s for velocity estimates in the common carotid artery and the internal branch. The root-mean-square difference was 0.17 m/s in the external branch. For the 10 volunteers, the mean difference between VFI and MRA was -0.17 m/s for peak systolic velocities of laminar flow in vivo. The precision in vivo was calculated as the mean standard deviation (SD) of estimates aligned to the heart cycle and was highest in the center of the common carotid artery (SD = 3.6% for velocity magnitudes and 4.5° for angles) and lowest in the external branch and for vortices (SD = 10.2% for velocity magnitudes and 39° for angles). The results indicate that plane wave VFI measures flow precisely and that estimates are in good agreement with a CFD simulation and MRA.

Original languageEnglish
JournalUltrasound in Medicine & Biology
Volume44
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1727-1741
ISSN0301-5629
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Blood Flow Velocity/physiology
  • Carotid Arteries/diagnostic imaging
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Reference Values
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Ultrasonography/methods

Cite this